0

In the final battle of Avengers: Endgame, Doctor Strange is pretty much useless, spending almost all of the time holding water up so it doesn't flood the battleground.

Was there any sort of commentary from the directors/film crew as of why they chose to put him aside?

8
  • 1
    I don't know about directors, but personally my comment is that it wasn't his story. He filled the role he was meant to fill for that film.
    – sanpaco
    Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 13:24
  • 2
    Same with a lot of the other non-full-time avengers. They wanted the story to be about the big 5. Everybody else got a cameo, to squeeze in the entire franchise cast from the past 10 years, but the big 5 got the main screen time.
    – Tetsujin
    Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 13:27
  • 1
    Because there is only 1 way to beat Thanos and that way has to play out perfectly Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 13:35
  • 1
    @XtremeBaumer It's not like they're faithfully retelling events that actually happened. They made a conscious decision for the "1 way to beat Thanos" to include Doctor Strange doing very little in the final battle. Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 13:51
  • 2
    @XtremeBaumer Perhaps I was unclear; "they" in my comment is the writers of the screenplay. They can make that one necessary series of events pretty much anything they like. Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 14:04

3 Answers 3

11

Screenwriter Stephen McFeely touches on the issue in this New York Times interview, answering a question about deciding where in the two movies major events would happen:

Another big plot point is when everyone comes back. So the question is, is it early in the second movie? Late in the second movie? You notice the players left on the board are the O.G. Avengers [Captain America, Iron Man, Thor, the Hulk, Black Widow and Hawkeye], and let’s give them their due. It meant that we were likely going to bring people back late. So that if you were a big fan of Doctor Strange or Black Panther or Bucky [the Winter Soldier] or Sam [the Falcon], you’re only going to get a little brief window on them. It can’t be all things to all people.

And later answering a question about Captain Marvel's role:

Certainly, Captain Marvel is in [“Endgame”] a little less than you would have thought. But that’s not the story we’re trying to tell — it’s the original Avengers dealing with loss and coming to a conclusion, and she’s the new, fresh blood.

The newer members of the team whose powers could conceivably win the battle almost single-handedly -- Dr. Strange, Scarlet Witch, Captain Marvel -- weren't supposed to overshadow the original Avengers.

But Dr. Strange has played a key role:

  • He foresees the one future in which the Avengers win and arranges for that future to happen.
  • He gathers all the allies for the final battle (as TheLethalCarrot noted)
  • He holds back the water (as Gustavo Gabriel noted)
  • He holds up his finger to signal Tony Stark that this is the "one" path that leads to victory (as TheLethalCarrot noted)

Stark: Hey. You said one out of 14 million, we win, yeah? Tell me this is it.

Strange: If I tell you what happens, it won't happen.

"What happens" being that Tony must sacrifice himself by using the Infinity Stones.

3

I'm going to frame challenge your question and state that he had the one of the most important roles to play during the battle. As such he wasn't removed from the battle he was a vital part of it.

Strange was the one who went around and gathered up all of the Avengers and their allies to fight Thanos and his army. Had Strange not been around to do that Thanos would easily have beaten the Avengers.

PETER PARKER: Hey! Holy cow. You will not believe what's been going on. Do you remember when we were in space? And I got all dusty? I must've passed out, 'cause I woke up, and you were gone.But Doctor Strange was there, right? He was like, "It's been five years. Come on, they need us!" And then he started doing the yellow sparkly thing that he does all the time...

Avengers: Endgame

He then holds back the water and had that not happened the battlefield would have been swept through making many allied forces useless, injuring and killing others. He played a vital role in making sure things went smoothly for the team.

Lastly, he holds up the "1" finger for Tony which no matter how you look at it prompted Tony to act and sacrifice himself.

Without Strange and his actions the Avengers would have lost before the battle even began. He might not have done much fighting but he did stuff that was a lot more useful than that.

2
  • According to @Paulie_D, the question requires official reasons, and yours is an opinion. Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 16:17
  • @GustavoGabriel Hence why my answer is a frame challenge to the question which is perfectly fine. Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 16:17
2

There are no official answers, only in-universe explanations, which is that:

Strange saw one outcome where they win, him holding up that water is part of it.

In Avengers: Infinity War, Strange tells Iron man that he saw more than 14 million possible future outcomes, and in only of them they win.

So, in the one outcome where they win, he probably saw what his role had to be in the final battle, that being holding up that water so it doesn't flood the battlefield.

4
  • 2
    This does not answer the question which requests official reasons, not an opinion.
    – Paulie_D
    Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 14:28
  • 5
    @Paulie_D It's not an opinion. It's just the in-universe explanation, which doesn't answer the out-of-universe question of why that was the decided series of events in-universe. Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 14:30
  • 1
    The quesion asks for official comments and this does not provide them. If you don't have official comments then there is no point in answering and thus it is an opinion as to why.
    – Paulie_D
    Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 14:33
  • 1
    @Paulie_D: The answer references an actual quote from the movie, which is used precisely to explain why specific things need to happen. If you dismiss that as opinionated, then you're effectively trying to override the explicitly given plot as it is presented; which is opinion-based.
    – Flater
    Commented Jun 26, 2019 at 15:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .