Close to the beginning of Going in Style we see Willie talking to the doctor about his kidney failure, and how he will need a transplant. The dialogue goes something like this:

Doctor: Have you talked to your family about this?

Willie: I will.

Doctor: Sooner than later. They probably be the best matches anyway.

Now, at the end of the movie, we see that Albert is the one chosen to have his kidney transplanted to Willie. But Albert is only a friend/roomate of Willie.

As far as I'm concerned, transplants are very complicated, the people involved must be compatible for the new organs/blood to work.

How does this work out? Shouldn't the person is chosen for the transplant be a complete match? Or Did Willie just get lucky that his roommate is compatible?

2 Answers 2


Disclaimer: I'm practically a Willie, except younger. I have received a living-donor transplant, and now know a bit about the whole process. Although the details vary by region, the general process is the same.


  • It's not at all difficult for two random people to match to a satisfactory degree, for renal transplantation, at least.
  • The real problem is eligibility of the donor and receiver to donate or receive a kidney, considering the risks of a complicated surgery.
  • When I watched the movie, especially the ineligibility of Albert to donate came across as laughably unrealistic.

Firstly, let me say as a preamble, that there remains a lot to be improved regarding transplantation in general. Kidney transplants are the most common and therefore most studied transplants, and there are lots of extra complications associated with other transplants. However, if we knew the exact details of even making kidney transplants lasting, the so-called long-term rejection wouldn't have been incurable, and transplanted organs wouldn't have had, essentially, an expiry date.

My point being that it's possible to provide some insights as to whether or not Willie's case is likely, but I'm wary of using phrases like "there is no way . . . ".

The experiments

Paulie_D's answer goes into enough detail about the 'matching' lab tests. From anecdotal experience, I have never encountered people that have a problem with those though, as long as blood types match. Kidneys from closer relatives than a random stranger tend to last longer, but generally there are so many important factors affecting the success of it all, especially the lifestyle the receiver chooses after transplant, so it's not a word of God.

Where I live, as long as the most important factors (The blood types A, B, and O, and the rhesus antigen) match, the minutiae of the Panel-reactive test are usually not too significant, because they tend to match as well.

As far as I recall, the default in the cross-match test is that there is no match, which means the white blood cells won't pick up the antigens on the transplant organ cells. In this test, it's not that they would attack unless we're lucky, it's that they normally won't attack unless we're unlucky. I could be wrong about it, though bear in mind that the nine donors I met all had 0 of the 18 'problematic' antigens that would match.

Personally, I was one unlucky candidate, and it didn't work out with eight different donors before the ninth did (they went through the blood type filter first), but the hurdle wasn't the cross-match test, or the Antibody test, but that the donors were ineligible.

The devil is in the details of the full check-up. The receiver, or the donor, may be ineligible for a myriad of reasons. My donation candidates were all young, yet a single metric in each would've meant they were bound to get into trouble if they donated their kidney.

There are also other tests, like a checking of veins for anatomical compatibility, but they're often not critical to the possibility of transplant.

Transplant, the better option

To need transplant in the first place is an entirely plausible and real situation. It's not necessarily because of kidney failure per se (There are patients on dialysis who were born without kidneys), but because of the worsening condition. Dialysis helps keep the levels of bad things in blood in check (most importantly, BUN and creatinine), but considering they're usually products of complex metabolic reactions, it's possible that their levels spiral out of control for unknown reasons. There is also balances like phosphorus/calcium in blood, and dialysis is usually very ineffective in getting rid of excess phosphorus.

Patients are also usually just 'better off' with a transplant, even mentally so. Transplant patients, especially elderly ones, have a longer life expectancy than if they remained on dialysis.

Willie's eligibility

This is one part that drifts a bit away from realism. All the benefits of transplants aside, things are a bit tougher for a receiver, since they have to endure

  • Surgical wounds (depending on the method, may be large or relatively small)
  • The presence of an alien organ (they have to make up space, this is not too much of an issue for kidney transplants usually)
  • Heavy immunosuppressive drugs with typically dire side effects

It's therefore not unreasonable that a transplant receiver may be considered ineligible for a lot of seemingly unrelated reasons, including old age. This article discusses the mortality rate for transplant patients older than 60. In some jurisdictions, these factors are considered so seriously that surgeons may outright refuse to perform transplant.

Willie's doctor was way more likely to adjust his dietary plans further, or increase the dosage of some of the medication, or dialysis intervals. It's much safer, if a bit more depressing and painful for Willie. There's also the fact that even if he didn't like dialysis, he didn't mind it either, from a mental aspect. IMHO, it was a tool to incentivize Willie and drive the plot further, and not strictly realistic.

Albert's eligibility

This one drifts away so drastically it's Fast 3. First off, you can't ever stop hearing this from the professionals in the field: "Well, what does an old kidney look like, anyway?"

The two most important factors damaging kidney health are old age, and poor lifestyle habits that tend to ultimately lead to high blood pressure or diabetes. Albert doesn't strike me as the most glaring example of success in either regard. Him donating his kidney is like donating the overused battery of an old laptop. It's very unlikely to be of much use to Willie.

Not only is it going to be of little use to Willie, it will end up posing health risks for Albert too. The main caveat for a living donor is, well, that they lack a kidney! They would need to monitor their blood pressure and stop eating salty or very sweet food. It would be very possible that, a year from transplant, Albert would need dialysis or transplant himself.

Young donors don't usually get into much trouble if they don't smoke, or drink alcohol. Poor nutrition could cause trouble in old age just like good ol' Albert, but this part would have made much more sense if there was a sacrificial son who just repaired his relationship with the father throughout the movie, and who found himself guilty for neglecting the old man's condition, maybe?


How does this work out? Shouldn't the person chosen for the transplant be a complete match? Or Did Willie just get lucky that his roomate is compatible?

Essentially both, but it's not that lucky..

Ideally the transplant donor should be a family member to increase the chances of a match but it's not actually necessary.

All that is necessary is a blood-type match and a tissue-type match.

Blood typing is the first blood test that must show your blood and the recipient's blood is compatible.

If your blood type works with the recipient's blood type, you will take the next blood test (tissue typing). If your blood type does not work, you will not be able to donate.


Tissue typing is a blood test that matches the number of antigens the donor and recipient share. These antigens can recognize the difference between two people's body tissue.

Each person has six basic tissue typing antigens (or markers) shared equally from their parents. The markers help tell which donor will be the best match between the recipient and donor. A parent and child would have at least 50 percent match while siblings could have a zero to 100 percent match.

The best match for the recipient is to have six out of six antigens match. (This is known as a zero mismatch.) It is possible for all six markers to match.

It is not necessary that you match your antigens for a successful transplant. Even matching one antigen may make for a more successful transplant than matching five or six antigens from a deceased donor kidney.


Finally there is a cross-match to check for rejection

Cross-matching is a blood test you and the recipient will have at least two different times to see if the recipient will react to your kidney. If there is no reaction, the result is a negative cross-match. This means the transplant surgery can happen.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .