10

Metropolis (1927) talks about the importance of a mediator between the hand and the head. In the movie the head is the capitalists and the hand is the workers. A core aspect of Social Democracy and the Nordic model in Scandinavian countries is the importance of dialogue between trade unions and employees organizations, a mediator of sorts. So does Metropolis advocate for Social Democracy? Metropolis Restored

  • 1
    Welcome to Movies & TV. Nice question, seeing the time period and cultural/political backdrop it was made in, that interpretation isn't too unlikely afterall. – Napoleon Wilson Feb 8 '15 at 15:42
  • It's too bad that the full film isn't available any more. I wonder if this would be easier to intuit if the original cut were still available. – Catija Feb 8 '15 at 19:50
  • 1
    @Catija I thought that they had done a near complete reconstruction in 2010, I actually watched it on TV this way. Is there anything significant lacking in that version? – Napoleon Wilson Feb 8 '15 at 21:04
  • @NapoleonWilson I actually just saw that... I graduated from Film school in 2010, so the last time I thought about Metropolis was before they did the newest reconstruction. The Wiki does say that there are still a couple of scenes missing because even the newly discovered film was very badly damaged. I wonder if many people have seen the newer reconstruction. – Catija Feb 8 '15 at 21:06
2

No, not particularly regarding a mediator. A mediator between the working class and the capital is not an exclusive feature of social democracy and the scandinavian model is a sub category of social democracy. There's rather a strong reference to Marx regarding the revolte. The movie is rather slightly adovcating left-winged politics in general. He might have been favoring social democracy over marxism regarding the outcome of the revolte. This might have been an indirect comment on Marx.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .