6

I have just seen the first episode of Sherlock.

The cab driver offered Sherlock 2 bottles. Once containing a poisionous pill, and the other has a "no effect" pill. Or at least that's what the cab driver claims.

Sherlock knew that the driver had a fake gun. Sherlock picked the bottle that was far from him. As they were both about to swallow their pills, Dr. Watson shoots the cab driver.

Question 1: Was time of the essence in that situation? I mean there was no threat, no time limit. Dr. Watson could have gone to the other building and arrest the cab driver. So why did Sherlock say that he was buying time?

Question 2: Do both bottles contain "bad pills"? and the cab driver only pretends that he is about to swallow the other pill while in fact he is encouraging the victim to swallow first?

Question 3: Why kill the cab driver if more information can be obtained if he is arrested?

  • I always thought the cab driver simply took a corresponding antidote beforehand so that both pills would be lethal and he could still be (rather) save. – Thomas Jul 2 '18 at 14:20
9

Regarding questions 1 and 3: John saw (through the window) both men about to take their pills. He assumed that Sherlock would swallow the pill, so he decided to shoot.

Regarding question 2: We don't know that, but if Sherlock was right in his deduction there was only one poisonous pill. From Baker Street wiki:

Summing up his observations, Sherlock ventures that the "game", as the cabbie calls it, is about his children. The cabbie confirms he has been estranged from his children for three years and has been told that he is dying. He adds that the inheritance he will leave for them is only meagre, And in that moment, focusing on his children and his mortality, the cabbie looks to the pill bottle on his left. Sherlock deduces that is where death is.

0
  1. Time was not a factor, but tension and curiosity added pressure, and Sherlock was confident so he picked a pill quickly. He said he was biding his time to John, who immediately called him on his bullshit.

  2. Only one pill bottle was bad. Poison doesn't take immediate effect, and he put the pill at least in his mouth at the same time as his victim. It was a game. He was going to die anyways, why not take a few people with him? If they chose the right bottle, his life wasn't shortened by much. If they took the bad bottle, more money to his kids.

  3. John didn't hear the conversation, he just saw them both about to take the pills and shot in an effort to save Sherlock. And Sherlock was just playing the game.

0

Lol, actually sherlock was biding time to see what more he could deduce, or even find another option, the gun, as he had saw him use it earlier. As we can see in evidence later, Sherlock did not realize that it was John until explaining it to the constable.

Many times Sherlock observed Watsons incompetence when it came to observation, yet only praised him for his medical expertise. The fact is that Sherlock had no bearing of the genius of this benefactor, Moriarty. The cabbie established false evidence of his successes by using the murders of previous victims while in reality, this time, both pills were poison. He was a dead man regardless of his choice, and he certainly did gain money for his family previously.

However seeing that it was Moriarty running the show, this time it was a genius manuever and had the means to compensate the family according to the murder of Sherlock. (Yes he wanted to kill SH despite his being a “fan” of him so that he could express his superiority over him.) The cabbie as a note, did not reveal the answer because the distraction of his benefactor immediately took priority in SH’s mind as priority for future possible consequence. A-whabam.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .