8

During the final scenes of the movie Dunkirk we see a German plane attack the Moonstone when it is returning (scene begins around the 1:44 of the clip). Mr. Dawson evades the attack charge by changing the direction at the last minute. We also see a plane shape up to attack the British forces on shore but Farrier shoots it down at the last minute.

Farrier had already shot down the Bomber (The plane that fell and ignited the oil) and this scene is after that moment in the timeline because Farrier had not exhausted his fuel when he shot down the bomber but when he shoots down the last German plane, he was already gliding.

The Moonstone is full of rescued soldiers (some covered in oil) when it was attacked the final time so it can't have been the same bomber which was shot earlier by Farrier.

What happened to the plane that attacked the Moonstone? Was it the one shot down in the end by Farrier? Does this mean Farrier shot 2 German planes before crash landing himself?

  • Events that unfold in different scenes do not flow in a linear fashion, time-wise, as well, so I didn't try to keep track all that carefully. I just assumed that one of the planes shot somewhere along the line was that one. – PoloHoleSet Apr 25 at 17:28
4
+50

Info from the scene you linked to and the script (pdf download).

There are 2 different German planes:

1) Stuka

Shot down by Farrier as described in Scene 71.

2) Me-109

Scene 72:

The 109 flashes over... Collins watches it recede.
                  COLLINS
        He’s off.
                  MR. DAWSON
        Bigger fish to fry.

The Me-109 doesn't attack them and flies off, never mentioned again (and there is no further air fight). It appears that it had a different target. It was a Fighter and attacking the Moonstone with machine gun fire may not have been too effective.

Farrier shoots down the Dive bomber (Stuka), but doesn't meet the Me-109.


Further interesting information that sheds light on Dunkirk:

1) How much the audience gets to know

From Eliza Berman's interview with Christopher Nolan in Time, July 2017:

There are very few “God shots.” Everything is about trying to have the camera there on the beach with the soldiers. In the aerial sequences, the camera is always in the cockpit or mounted to the plane, always somewhere where it would need to be to photograph that kind of combat. And on the small yacht crossing the Channel to come to the rescue of the men, we almost never take the camera off the boat. Everything is shot from the point of view of the characters.

and

Films have a sophisticated level of grammar that’s developed over the hundred years of cinema­ to be able to tell the audience everything and have them know much more than the characters. I actually wanted to take a step back and say, “What would you know if you were actually stuck on that beach?” The more I read firsthand accounts, the more apparent it became that part of the terror, part of the real sense of fear and isolation and vulnerability of these men, was not knowing what was happening. Not knowing, lining up on the beach out to sea, if somebody was going to come and get them or not.

Additionally, from Dave Trumbore's March 2017 interview with Christopher Nolan in Collider:

The challenge of taking on what I call a present-tense narrative – that is to say, we don’t learn a lot about the people we’re experiencing this with. We really just try to live in the moment and experience it with them, and look through their eyes.

2) Timeline

From Christina Radish's February 2018 Collider interview with Christopher Nolan:

Q: Time has been a recurring central theme of your films, particularly Inception, Interstellar and Dunkirk. With Dunkirk, you cut between three storylines that take place in an hour, a day and a week. What was the thought process behind that and how a Shepard tone influenced the writing and the music?

NOLAN: The structure of the script was created to try to give a feeling of relentless tension. It was short because I didn’t want to exhaust the audience. It was only a 76-page script, and I based the structure on a principle from the musical world, called the Shepard tone. It’s essentially an audio illusion, whereby you can make it seem like the tones are continuously rising and never stop. We used that in the music for The Prestige. We used it in the sound effects for the Batpod in The Dark Knight. It never downshifts. The engine is always going up. What I did with Dunkirk was apply the mathematical principle of how that works to the script structure, so that one of the three storylines is always peaking, one after the other. There’s a tumbling forward quality to the narrative, so that it never really lets you relax or rest.

3) Not a war film

From an Joshua Levine's interview with Christopher Nolan:

So I don’t see it as a war film. I see it as a survival story. That’s why we don’t see the Germans in the film and why it’s approached from the point of view of the pure mechanics of survival rather than the politics of the event.

Conclusion

  • We don't know more than the soldiers and they only know what they see. So there's not the Me-109 attacking the Moonstone, it's just a Me-109 doing it, and the fisherboat's crew has to handle it. What that Me-109 does then, neither we nor the men on the boat know (and are supposed to know). In their fight for survival, the enemy remains faceless.
  • The movie is shot and the timelines intersect in a way that there is always tension and they peak one after another, hence the way the two attacks are filmed in the scene.
  • 1
    (Too little to edit, but it's Farrier :) It is a strange ending, though (although, admittedly, I've not seen the film): why is there suddenly a third plane? – Joachim Apr 25 at 16:19
  • 1
    @Joachim Thanks! I can only guess, but probably to create more tension (the way the whole scene is shot - the mole and the Moonstone being attacked at the very same time) and also to show that danger was everywhere. And how a captain of one of the small fisherboats, saving people under risk, was also quite capable of handling such a situation. Instead of heroic speeches, heroic deeds. – Anne Daunted Apr 25 at 17:18
  • That clears it up. This means Farrier shot down 2 planes and there was a third one just harrying the retreating allies. – RedBaron Apr 25 at 17:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .