8

In Inception, Cobb's totem was a spinning top, that in reality would stop spinning eventually.

Arthur's totem was a special dice, that in reality would roll a particular number more often.

Ariadne's totem seems too simplistic for that purpose... a chess piece (bishop) that she knocks over.

I realize she drills a little into it, possibly making it lighter or changing the center of gravity to make it easier to knock over... but that seems too simplistic... a projection or another person in her dream could easily replace that totem that she would knock over, and it still goes over...

It seems to me that in order to work properly as a totem, it would change state in only a way you would know to expect as validation of YOUR dream or someone else's dream. Whereas Cobb's totem's action is only known to him/Mal and Arthur's totem's special feature is only known to Arthur as well, Ariadne's totem seem too easy to copy by another architect. Why does it work as a proper totem?

  • ... and that's why she killed herself (because she couldn't tell whether she was in a dream or not) – ibrahim mahrir Dec 19 '18 at 5:11
  • 4
    You're thinking of Mal Ibrahim, Adriane was Ellen Page's character. Enorl, I don't have an answer for you, but the top is actually Mal's totem, they never reveal Cobb's although it's theorized it's his wedding ring. – GordonBennett Dec 19 '18 at 8:20
  • @GordonBennett There are other questions on that; but in the story, there's nothing preventing the top from being Cobb's totem after Mal died. The person who would be able to replicate it was dead so there was no risk. – JMac Dec 19 '18 at 13:45
  • it seems that you think it's too simplistic, and your question will only invite answers with opinions from others. Her totem is not shown in again the movie so we have no objective way of knowing if it's effective or not. You could argue the same about Eames' poker chip. – Luciano Dec 19 '18 at 14:33
  • 1
    @Luciano It's not necessarily about opinions. He just isn't considering some of the evidence from the film, such as never letting someone else touch your totem. All the totems are relatively simple, but his misunderstanding of the mechanism they use to check doesn't mean we can't understand how the totems were effective. – JMac Dec 19 '18 at 14:50
8

It follows the same concept as Arthur's special dice, basically the exact same concept.

Consider for example, how Arthur would know the die is his. He couldn't just rely on which face the die landed on. For one thing, a loaded die doesn't always land on the same side. And then if it did, and that was his check for the totem, it would just take observation to be able to fake his totem and trick him in a dream. What Arthur would know and be checking for when he picks up his die is the weight distribution. He had to become intimately familiar with the weight and feel of his particular die, and this allows him to know that it is his.

Ariadne essentially did the same thing. She machined her bishop to have a specific weight distribution that isn't apparent just from observation. She knows what the weight distribution of the bishop would feel like (and can test it by knocking the bishop down, similar to how Arthur would know the feeling of throwing his loaded die).

It's not about how easy it is to knock over, it's a combination of how easy it knocks over, how it feels when knocking it over, which direction it goes, etc. Someone just observing the bishop fall might be able to come close to reproducing the weight distribution; but because they don't know how much force she applies when handling the piece, they can never perfectly replicate it if they don't pick it up themselves. This is why the rule was to never let anyone else touch your totem. They need to be sure they are the only ones who know the specifics of the totem.

Even Mal's top would have had it's own weight distribution presumably. A top spinning on it's own isn't a very secure totem and could easily be reproduced by someone else's dream. They wouldn't know the weight distribution though, and that combined with never letting anyone else touch it is one of the few ways you could ensure someone doesn't dream a copy of it through observation.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .