The film First Man (2018) is about Neil Armstrong and the Apollo 11 mission to the Moon. In the movie, one scene shows

Armstrong drop his deceased daughter's bracelet into a crater on the Moon. The bracelet is used in the film as a symbol for his grief over his daughter's death.

Did he actually do this in real life or was this a fictional plot device added by the film makers?

  • 4
    @StuperUser not at all, in fact I find it an interesting and plausible detail which I had never heard before. But this film is a biopic and as with any biopic, the film makers tend to take artistic license with some of the details. So I am curious about whether this detail is specifically backed up by fact or an artistic license. As evidenced by several provided answers, there are sources indicating that the author of the book and the writer of the screenplay added this detail as an interesting possibility, but it can not be confirmed because Armstrong never claimed or denied that it happened.
    – sanpaco
    Commented Oct 15, 2018 at 16:54
  • 3
    I really hope not. It would change one small step for man into one personal step for a man Commented Oct 15, 2018 at 21:32
  • 5
    @JamieClinton there is documented evidence that all the Apollo astronauts were allowed to take personal items to the Moon. I don't think that allowing them to have a personal connection with the trip detracts at all from the giant leap of what it accomplished for mankind.
    – sanpaco
    Commented Oct 16, 2018 at 17:34
  • 1
    @JamieClinton If you're upset about a man paying respect to his dead daughter, I hope nobody ever tells you about Alan Shepard hitting a golf ball on the moon... Commented Oct 16, 2018 at 22:36
  • Vintage Space has something to say about this as well.
    – user56806
    Commented Oct 17, 2018 at 9:46

4 Answers 4


This is addressed explicitly in the biography First Man: The Life of Neil A. Armstrong, by James R. Hansen, which the film is based on, and whose author is presumably the Jim mentioned in wcullen's answer.

Armstrong never released any information about the contents of his [Personal Preference Kit]. He agreed to do so for publication in this boo, but reported that he was unable to find the manifest among his many papers.


"I didn't bring anything else for myself," Neil would declare. "At least not that I can remember." As for Janet, the only thing taken to the Moon for her was the olive branch pin. "He didn't ask me if I wanted to send anything."

Perhaps surprisingly, Armstrong took nothing else for family members--not even for his two boys, a fact that still distresses Janet. "I assumed he had taken things to give to the boys later, but I don't believe he has ever given them anything. Neil can be thoughtful, but he does not give much time to being thoughtful, or at least to expressing it."

Another loved one that Neil apparently did not remember by taking anything of hers to the Moon was his daughter, Karen. What could have made the first Moon landing more meaningful "for all mankind" than a father honoring the cherished memory of his beloved little girl, by taking a picture of the child, dead now over seven years (she would have been a ten-year-old), one of her toys, an article of her clothing, a lock of hair, her baby bracelet? Astronaut Gene Cernan, just before he left the lunar surface on Apollo 17, had written the initials of his nine-year-old daughter, Tracy, in the dust. Buzz Aldrin carried photos of his children to the Moon. Charlie Duke left a picture of his family on the surface.

What if Neil did something for Muffie but never told anyone about it, not even Janet, because it was of such an intensely personal nature? How much more would posterity esteem the character of the First Man? It could have elevated the first Moon landing to an even higher level of significance. Among those who feel so are Neil's sister June, who knew her brother as well as anyone.

"Did he take something of Karen with him to the Moon?" was June's rhethorical question.

"Oh, I dearly hope so."

Perhaps the mystery will be solved when humankind returns, as it surely will, to Tranquility Base.

As mentioned in the existing answers, this makes the incident a plausible educated theory, but I do find the added context w.r.t. Neil's living sons to be certainly relevant.

I'm bothered by the exact textual match between Hansen and Singer's report of June Hoffman's response. Were they both present in the same interview? Did she give a word-for-word exactly identical response on two separate occasions? Is either of the two accounts a paraphrase of the other? (Just things to consider.)


There is no evidence to show he did this, but it's not implausible.

I've read a number of historical accounts of NASA through the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo era, as well as biographies of many Astronauts (though not including Neil) and Engineers on the program and I've never heard of this before.

This is covered in an article in the Washington Post.

That said, it would almost certainly have been possible. Astronauts were allowed some personal items on the missions. Buzz Aldrin took items to take Communion on the Moon on the Apollo 11 mission. On Apollo 15 there was a scandal when the astronauts took a number of postal covers on the trip to sell for a profit later.

So, it's a fictional element of the story and there's no account written about it, but its not impossible or even improbable that he would do something like this.

  • 2
    Indeed the previous version was a misrepresentation, but I consider the problem fixed. And indeed, both First Man and *A Life of Flight" stop distinctly short of definitive evidence, but "there is no definitive evidence" is a far cry from "there is a substantive corpus of literature that ought to mention this and it's nowhere in sight", as v1 claimed.
    – E.P.
    Commented Oct 15, 2018 at 1:57
  • 1
    I'm not saying it "ought" to mention it just saying nothing does. Its an intensely private action and it's not surprising that it's not public knowledge.
    – iandotkelly
    Commented Oct 17, 2018 at 14:12
  • No. You were saying "nothing does" while conveniently omitting to mention that your definition of "nothing" did not include the obvious places that might mention it; this was certainly disingenuous in v1. As I said, the problem is fixed, but I'm really surprised that an SE mod is trying to pretend that something this bad wasn't a problem to begin with.
    – E.P.
    Commented Oct 17, 2018 at 15:26
  • 1
    Dude, I'm just a contributor, trying my best to answer questions about a subject I enjoy, in every respect no more or less important than you. My role as a moderator has almost no bearing on this. I'm just trying to gently refute that I had any disingenuous intent to "conveniently" omit information. Happy to leave it there, or even delete this answer.
    – iandotkelly
    Commented Oct 17, 2018 at 16:19
  • 1
    Your answer is the only accurate one. Taking his sister years later saying she hopes so, as any kind of evidence for the movie's claim is ridiculous. Its the flying teapot fallacy.
    – Kosmos
    Commented Oct 17, 2018 at 16:22


Apparently screenwriter Josh Singer

asked Armstrong's sister, June Hoffman, whether her brother had left something for Karen on the moon. June's response: "Oh, I dearly hope so."

"Nearing the bar we were setting for ourselves in terms of accuracy, I never would have felt comfortable doing that on my own," Singer said. "But hearing that it's good enough for Jim, and good enough for June, it was good enough for me."

So, it wasn't fully a Hollywood-ized version of the moon landing. It is more of an educated theory.


  • If someone saying "I hope so" is an educated theory, we got a lot of textbooks to rewrite.
    – Kosmos
    Commented Oct 17, 2018 at 16:17

Armstrong never spoke about this publicly.

Jay Barbree's biography Neil Armstrong: A Life of Flight (Thomas Dunne Books, 2014) says, on p. 272 of the paperback edition,

In the lunar dust, Neil and Buzz placed mementos for the five deceased American and Russian space flyers, Gus Grissom, Ed White, Roger Chafee, Vladimir Komarov and Yuri Gagarin (the first in space had died in a plane crash the year before), and one small cargo—private and honorable—carried by Neil. It was not to be divulged. It was a diamond-studded astronaut pin made specially for Deke Slayton by the three Apollo 1 astronauts who planned to fly it on their mission before that dreadful fire. And there was one other remembrance. Very special and dear to Neil, a part of an unfinished life he so wanted to leave on the moon, and he did.

It's quite clear that the “unfinished life” is that of his daughter Karen Anne (“Muffie”). Barbree also writes (p. 44),

Neil seldom spoke of this overwhelming heartache in his life. But others were convinced Karen Anne's death was the single most important reason he would submit his name to become an astronaut. Her death gave him a new purpose. A few months before Neil's own passing, I asked him, “Is there something of Muffie's on the moon?”

I read his smile to mean yes.

Barbree was NBC's space correspondent basically forever and reported on every manned NASA launch. He describes himself as being a close friend of Neil Armstrong's for over 50 years, and the introduction to the book talks about how Armstrong was a stickler for accuracy. Barbree is particularly sensitive about Karen Anne's death, as one of his own sons died during childbirth.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .