At the start of the rebooted series, in Casino Royale, we see Bond gain his 00 status, and through that film and Quantum of Solace Bond goes on his 'first' adventure. Skyfall continues this 'firsts' theme, by reintroducing some stalwarts of the original franchise:

  • Moneypenny
  • M's wooden office with the studded leather door and Moneypenny in the anteroom
  • Q division
  • Bond's DB5

Yet Skyfall also has a theme of ageing:

  • Bond is getting too old according to some characters, M also
  • Bond and Silva apparently served together in the 80s (before Bond was a 00-agent?)
  • Bond's DB5 is apparently an old Q-division product, that M is familiar with

Does this theme contradict the concept of a rebooted franchise showing us the beginning of Bond's career?

  • 2
    By the way, I think it was the 90s when Silva worked for M in Hongkong. But interresting question.
    – Napoleon Wilson
    Dec 28, 2012 at 12:27
  • 2
    I had no idea the British sometimes use the spelling "ageing". If you prefer it, you should also change the second paragraph to the same spelling.
    – wallyk
    May 8, 2013 at 17:51
  • Ha! Nice catch. Thanks! This does raise an issue over British vs. American on a site like this though. I couldn't find anything in meta. I got my spelling from the fact that Collins dictionary redirects 'aging' to 'ageing', but I agree that it's 'either… or…'.
    – nimasmi
    May 9, 2013 at 17:01

3 Answers 3


This answer was already partly asked and answered here, but to offer a quick answer for this question: No. The thing you have to keep in mind is that while Quantum of Solace is directly after Casino Royale (the opening car chase in QoS being very soon after Bond shoots Mr. White in the leg at the end of CR), Skyfall is set sometime after Quantum of Solace. Although the actor Daniel Craig had only aged a few years, we have no indication of how many years he aged in the new Bond universe. Thus, it's entirely possible that Bond had many adventures in between Quantum of Solace and Skyfall, including when he got the old Aston Martin (which M would have known about, seeing as it was an expensive piece of equipment given to Bond to use at one point).

As for Bond and Silva, I don't believe they actually worked together, just that Bond was familiar with Silva's having worked for M while she was stationed in Hong Kong (after all, there are only a limited amount of 00's out there).

  • 3
    And in the end even the 4 real years between the movies can be a long time in such an ehausting job.
    – Napoleon Wilson
    Dec 28, 2012 at 12:26

I think you are somehow right while otherwise not. It is true that in the first two Craig-movies we see a fresh and new Bond, who is eager to get into the action and is maybe also driven by a bit of a juvenile arrogance (and passionate vengeance in Quantum of Solace). And yet in Skyfall we see a mature Bond who might still not be really grown up emotionally but who maybe has found the routine in his job (and is even a bit fed up with it), and we don't have to forget that it really is an exhausting job that might let you get old quite fast (and "00s have a very short life expectancy" anyway). And in the end he already had to make a carreer before becoming a 00, but I think it was rather the 90s when Silva worked for M in Hong Kong (though not with Bond, they didn't really know each other before).

So yes, he indeed shows some signs of aging and boredom (for lack of a better term), yet this doesn't necessarily mean retirement but merely maturity and getting used to his job. It thus prepares the ground not for the 3rd, but the 2nd act of his carreer, as the last scene of the movie emphasizes, when he is more ready to go on than ever before, actually strengthened by his past experiences (which also suggests that maybe M, being kind of a mother figure for James, actually had to die to further his development). The beginning of his carreer might be gone by the third movie, but this certainly doesn't mean that the end is immediately near. The ageing theme of the movie doesn't contradict the rebooting, but just extends it by a more dynamic development of its main character, more so than all the previous movies of the whole franchise did. We're thus not going to see an old Bond in the future movies, but a grownup one.

This also fits together with Skyfall's ambivalence of on the one hand continuing the modern rebooted line of the first two Craig-movies, while still going more into traditional Bond directions. It introduces classical characters, like Q and Moneypenny, while at the same time adapting them to the modernized line of the reboot.

In the same way MI6 is constantly depicted as (or accused of) getting old and useless now the cold war is over and Bond and M being relics of the past. But it are those old strengths that are needed to win against Silva who comes, like Bond, from the "shadows" of the past and is, with his madness, his desolate island he just "took over" and his whole attitude, more of a good old Bond-supervillain than anyone before him in the reboot. And indeed this is even emphasized by M in her speech before the court, when she says that

Our enemies [...] do not exist on a map, they're not nations, they're individuals.

And those individuals come from the good old times, like Silva and Bond. And this whole theme of reinvention of past virtues is both emphaszed by Bond travelling back to his own past in order to fight Silva on his own territory (and what could be older and more conservative than an old mansion in the Highlands) and this with the goold old DB5, an obvious nod to the old movies.

So at the bottom of the line you are right in that there is an obvious theme of aging of Bond (as a character but also his movie-franchise), while it is on the other hand emphasized that this old-fashionedness is what makes him different and thus a chance to use at his advantage and that both Bond and his movies should, while keeping at pace with modern developments, still not hesitate to remember their traditions. And what could emphasize this more than the overly nostalgic ending scene, which is both new in light of the reboot, but more old-fashioned than ever before when seen in light of the whole franchise.


I think that the ageing concepts in the Bond movie are related to the old movies so they are both a bit of an in-joke and a way of saying this was how things used to be, now they are changing.

The overall theme of the movie is definitely one of change, out with the old and in with the new.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .