8

During the course of The Terror Dr. Stanley is depicted as a largely arrogant and uninterested person without much emotional connection to either the expedition or the rest of the crew.

When Mr. Goodsir tells him about the lead poisoning from the canned provisions, he decides to not yet tell anyone about it (or simply didn't take Mr. Goodsir all too serious, like the rest of the time). When one of the crew members tells him about his depressions, he tells him not to worry about it too much and to enjoy the upcoming carneval as a distraction.

But then during the carneval in the episode "A Mercy" (S01E06), he suddenly sets fire to the entire camp and ultimately to himself, dying in the process and taking many crew members with him. This came entirely out of the blue to me for his character and I wonder what happened to him and why he completely lost it all of a sudden. Did he just despair at the situation they were in? Was there any kind of foreshadowing of this development of him that I might have missed?

1
  • I think the title can be changed to Why did Dr. Stanley start the fire? It still non spoilery & a better direct question. What do you think? Jun 8 '18 at 11:22
4

The scene takes place in the episode titled "Mercy". So I interpreted it as him doing mercy on everyone including himself.

When one of the crew member comes to Dr. Stanley complaining of losing his mind and hallucinating, the doctor brushes it off with mental stress. Then when Goodsir informs him of lead poisoning due to eating canned food, he can connect the dots to that patient.

He doesn't want to die slowly and painfully due to lead poisoning and scurvy. He knows it's coming for him and everyone. Still he maintains a calm demeanor and pretends to not care about it. The calm before the storm. That can be interpreted as denial.

So basically, he sets himself and everyone on fire as a mercy rather than having to die painfully while losing your mind with hallucinations.

There was actually foreshadowing. When Goodsir wants to talk to Stanley, he asks "Where's the fire, Mr. Goodsir?"

1
  • Anyone halfway-normal knows that burning to death is a pretty painful experience, and the only sane people who set themselves on fire do so in protest out of very deep convictions. Also, the Hippocratic Oath is a sacred oath to physicians, part of which is "First do no harm..." Mar 23 at 21:13
2

First, I can't say I completely agree with your assessment that

...Dr. Stanley is depicted as a largely arrogant and uninterested person without much emotional connection to either the expedition or the rest of the crew.

The British are pretty well known for their emotional reserve (at least in times past), and a medical officer/physician would almost surely display that characteristic. Certainly, he wasn't a very likable character; he was elitist, racist, sexist, and, yes, arrogant. But initially he showed some tenderness towards his patients (like the boy with consumption.)

Having said that, I didn't notice any particular foreshadowing, except that by then, some crewmembers were having significantly frightening hallucinations. Lead neurotoxicity...:

...results in development of irritability, headache, mental dullness and attention difficulty, memory loss, tremor, and hallucinations within weeks of exposure. Symptoms abruptly worsen to paralysis, convulsions, delirium, coma, or death.

While the show didn't show lead toxicity perfectly, it was pretty darn good. The doctor was eating food out of the tins like the other crew members; even Sir John wasn't above tinned food as we see in an early episode when he removes a piece of lead from his mouth during a meal. The doctor was as likely as anyone else to suffer from lead toxicity, and in his case, from delerium.

I believe what we were meant to take home from the "good doctor's" actions is two-fold: 1) how insidious the symptoms of lead poisoning are, and 2) how horrifying the results can be. The doctor appeared to be normal, as did most crew members, but he most certainly was not. He was delusional himself. The treatment for lead toxicity is not to kill everyone with it, and the doctor, if in his right mind, would have had to have known this. Burning to death is an extremely painful way to die; it's not a merciful end for anyone. The knowledge of this pain, the sanctity (then) of the Hippocratic Oath (First, do no harm...), and his setting himself ablaze (arms extended in a Christlike posture*), the horror of his actions is multiplied, which is appropriate in a horror story.

Finally, this strikes me as the case with the doctor (and some of the other expedition members' behavior as well) to show the audience that the biggest danger to these men at this desperate juncture wasn't the beast hunting them, but their own fellow man.**

*Delusions of grandeur are a very common type of delusion.
**Including, unfortunately, the company that provided the tins so carelessly created.

Watching this now, I was certainly horrified!

2
  • Thanks for your answer. Am I reading it right, that you're saying the doctor was a victim of the lead poisoning and depression/hallucinations himself? I don't think I considered that before and it's an interesting point you might want to make a bit more explicit in the answer.
    – Napoleon Wilson
    Mar 24 at 10:30
  • Yes, that's what I'm saying. I'll try to make that clearer, thanks. Mar 24 at 15:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .