In the movie, The American, Jack modifies a rifle for a female assassin; later he realises this rifle will be used to kill him so he modifies it further without telling the female assassin.

When the female assassin pulls the trigger, this rifle fires backwards and mortally wounds her.

I understand Jack is a highly skilled gunsmith, but is it possible to reverse a rifle mechanism in such a dramatic way?


  • 9
    My grandfather brother made DIY rifle in 1946. He used regular 9mm Kar bullet. The gas in chamber had so much pressure that it exploded when fired. So just using more powerful gunpowder than the rifle was designed for could be fatal. May 25, 2018 at 13:09
  • 17
    I like his name better as "Georgy Clooney". May 25, 2018 at 15:40
  • 2
    @maxathousand, thanks for pointing it out, I always have problems distinguish between steven and stephen, letting alone Georgy and George.
    – Yu Zhang
    May 25, 2018 at 20:04
  • 6
    As a retired Marine sniper, I can say from experience that yes indeed it is possible to rig a gun to misfire like that, either intentionally or by sheer incompetence, most if not all of which have been competently explained by others. Don't ask me why I felt compelled to say something, force of habit I guess. The most common I have seen are overpacking the rounds and not properly configuring the gas tubes. May 25, 2018 at 20:58
  • 4
    @YuZhang No, meaning putting too much or incorrect ratio of powder when making the bullet. May 26, 2018 at 19:41

4 Answers 4


While I am not a gun expert, it would be safe to say that while normal rifle cannot be modified to shoot bullet backward, it is possible to modify the rifle to make it hurt the shooter. All you'd need is an obstructed barrel and powerful enough bullet:

enter image description here

This is the photo from a real life accident - the shooter wasn't killed but seriously wounded.

  • 27
    A gun is basically a reinforced tube using explosion to push a piece of metal out. Block the tube and weaken the shooter's end of the tube and he just set off a pipe bomb in their face.
    – Nelson
    May 25, 2018 at 15:06
  • 5
    People unintentionally killing themselves with homemade zipguns used to be a weekly statistic. The only way a firearm can fail into a 'safe state' is when it's unloaded.
    – Mazura
    May 25, 2018 at 21:50
  • 1
    Note that this is a lever action of probably 19th century design. They were historically made out of brass or bronze, much more likely to shatter than a modern rifle.
    – Schwern
    May 25, 2018 at 21:59
  • 2
    @Schwern It is cast iron. An old Ballard black powder rifle, possibly a No. 5.
    – Legion600
    May 26, 2018 at 21:20

Modifying a rifle to catastrophically fail is easy compared to the precision of manufacture and maintenance needed for it to work properly.

Excerpt of firearm malfunctions that pose immediate danger and that can be intentionally facilitated :

In extreme cases [of mechanical malfunctions], an overloaded round, blocked barrel, poor design and/or severely weakened breech can result in an explosive failure of the receiver, barrel, or other parts of the firearm.

A dangerous situation can occur when a chambered round fires when the firearm is out-of-battery (called an out-of-battery discharge). The cartridge casing is not sufficiently strong to contain the pressure of firing by itself; it relies on the walls of the chamber and the bolt face to help contain the pressure. When the firearm is out-of-battery, the round is not fully chambered, or the bolt face is not against the rear of the cartridge, and if the round is fired in this situation, the case will fail, causing high-pressure hot gasses, bits of burning powder, and fragments of the casing itself to be thrown at high-speed from the firearm. This can be a serious hazard to the operator of the firearm, and any bystanders.

A squib load (also squib round, squib, squib fire, insufficient discharge, incomplete discharge) is an extremely dangerous malfunction that happens when a fired projectile does not carry enough force and becomes stuck in the gun barrel instead of exiting it. In the case of semi-automatic or automatic weapons, this can cause subsequent rounds to impact the projectile obstructing the barrel, which can cause a catastrophic failure of the structural integrity of the firearm, posing a threat to the operator or bystanders. The bullet from a squib stuck in the barrel must never be cleared by subsequently attempting to fire a live or blank round into an obstructed barrel. Blank rounds use a type of powder different from that of other rounds, and generate much more pressure, which, combined with the presence of the projectile obstructing the barrel may cause the firearm to fail catastrophically.

My grandfather's bolt-action Springfield has a high enough serial number on it that it's presumed to have an improper heat treatment on the bolt. The company has warned those with these that the bolt may fail catastrophically. If there's one thing on a firearm that you don't want to fail, it's the thing that's between you and the four thousand joules of energy you're about to release.

That also happens to be the weapon on which I learned : do not kiss the scope with your eye socket. In the picture shown, all she has to do is pull the trigger to have a bad day. When actors fire blanks it doesn't really matter, but when you plan on sending 150 grains of lead downrange at 3,000 fps... you'd better know what you're doing.


When the female assassin pulls the trigger, this rifle fires backwards and mortally wounds her.

I understand George Clooney is a highly skilled gunsmith, but is it possible to reverse a rifle mechanism in such a dramatic way?

Yes, but not to literally fire a bullet backwards. Instead they might be able to fire the guts of the gun into the shooter's face. With some guns that's plausible, but it turns out that's very difficult with the rifle used: the Ruger Mini-14.

Firing the bolt into the shooter's face?

Most rifles have a heavy cylinder of metal (the bolt) holding back an explosion (the powder charge) right in front of the shooter's face which unlocks with split second timing. With certain rifles if things go very wrong that bolt can wind up flying into the shooter's face. Those are rifles where you remove the bolt out the rear of the gun.

Rifles normally have multiple safety mechanisms and design elements preventing this from happening, but gunsmith may be able to disable these mechanisms and set up conditions so the gun will catastrophically fail.

The Infamous Ross Rifle

This is just what is supposed to have happened with the Ross Rifle.

The Canadian WWI era Ross Rifle is widely considered to be one of the worst military rifles in history. There's a persistent story that if you assemble the Ross Rifle incorrectly the bolt will come flying out the back and smack the shooter in the face. Some professional gunsmiths decided to try and replicate that. The results are educational.

Here's a discussion and demonstration. The disassembled it incorrectly, disabled a few safety features, and fired it. You can see it in slo-mo at 13:40. And it still managed to stop the bolt! They discuss what stopped it at 14:30.

Even though they couldn't manage it, they were limiting themselves to simulate a situation that might reasonably come up in the field. It's totally plausible a malicious gunsmith could deliberately modify such a rifle to cause the bolt to fly out the back and kill the shooter... if the shooter didn't inspect the rifle too closely.

But not the rifle in The American.

The Ruger Mini-14

I haven't seen The American, so I don't know what exactly happens, but the rifle in question is a Ruger Mini-14 that's been around since the 70s. Its basically a scaled down M1 Garand of WWII vintage. It's a semi-automatic, gas-operated, rotating-bolt rifle. It is extremely reliable.

As we said, in many rifles the bolt is designed to exit the rear of the gun, and the safeties to prevent this can be circumvented. But not the Ruger Mini-14.

The barrel and receiver are basically one big chunk of metal. The bolt comes out the front of the receiver for disassembly, as seen in this disassembly video. Behind the bolt is a very, very solid piece of metal.

A Disassembled Ruger Mini-14

I don't see how a gunsmith could modify the Ruger Mini-14 to have the bolt or anything else reliably fly into the shooter's fact without the shooter noticing the gun had been heavily modified.

What is plausible?

What George Clooney's character could have done is cause the chamber to blow out through a combination of weakening the lugs keeping the bolt locked in place, a barrel obstruction to increase the pressure on the chamber (hidden by his custom suppressor), and using an hot round with more than the normal amount of gunpowder to create over pressure in the barrel.

When she fired the round the excessive gases from the hot round would be momentarily blocked by the barrel obstruction building up pressure in the chamber. Unlike a vintage 1860 repeater made of weaker bronze or brass, a modern rifle with modern safeties made with modern metals is very unlikely to shatter under pressure. Instead, the weakened bolt lugs would fail and the chamber pressure would vent backwards into the shooter's face.

Not in a dramatic "bullet through the eye socket" or "hunk of metal lodged in the brain" sort of way. It would send small parts, bits of sheered lugs, plus the shell casing, flying backwards. Probably not large enough or fast enough to be reliably fatal, though I wouldn't want to be anywhere near it. The bolt would remain inside the receiver.

Not unlike what happens to the Ross Rifle. And as you can see, the ballistic gel behind the rifle is hardly scratched.

enter image description here

The much larger effect would be the shock, flash, and noise dazing the shooter. She's not wearing eye protection, so she might get shrapnel in her eyes. She's not wearing ear protection, so she'd definitely have hearing damage and disorientation.

She'd certainly be in no condition to fight back should George Clooney's character decide to finish the job.

Kentucky Ballistics is nearly killed by exactly that.

In April 2021, that nearly happened to "Kentucky Ballistics" in an accident. Their Serbu RN_50 anti-material rifle failed and nearly killed them. Again, not from the bullet flying backwards, but from parts of the gun flying backwards at high velocity. He life threatening injuries.

The Serbu RN-50 fires anti-material rounds normally at 55,000 PSI, same as the Ruger Mini-14 can experience. However, it is a very unique gun; instead of a traditional breech, it has a screw-on cap. That day he experienced a "freak accident". The gun appears to have been in full working order and well maintained. One of his rounds was "super hot", meaning it produced an extreme pressure in the chamber which the breech cap could not contain.

The threads holding the breech cap in place failed. The cap flew out the back of the gun at high velocity. It struck him in the face breaking bones around his eye. The cap drove the stock into his hand, breaking a finger. The cap had sheered metal parts off the lower receiver which lacerated his jugular vein and punctured his lung threatening his life.

Kentucky Ballistics later recreated the accident using an extremely over-pressured round at 185,000 PSI.

George Clooney's character could have supplied a similar over-pressured round and caused a similar failure in the assassin's Ruger Mini-14. However, as Kentucky Ballistics shows, it is not a reliable way to assassinate someone.

  • "that bolt can wind up flying into the shooter's face." Citation needed; I looked but found nothing.
    – Mazura
    May 26, 2018 at 0:54
  • 2
    @Mazura Watch the full Ross Rifle malfunction video, that's what they're trying to replicate. You can see in the last picture that the bolt is nearly out the back of the rifle. This is because in many older bolt-action rifles you can remove the bolt from the rear, as demonstrated at 12:25 in the video. At 14:05 they discuss what prevented it from flying out. Most modern rifles, such as the Ruger Mini-14 used in the film, have too many safety mechanisms and design elements for this to even come close to happening.
    – Schwern
    May 26, 2018 at 1:21
  • @Mazura I've cleaned up the "bolt out the back" section to make it clearer.
    – Schwern
    May 26, 2018 at 1:33
  • It might come far enough back to hit you in the face, but they didn't prove that improperly assembling the bolt can create a situation where it 'flies' out of the rifle. the bolt may slide all the way back to its stop not "come flying out the back". Owning two rifles that you remove the bolt from the rear, I have a pedantic interest in this ;) What I really want is a coroner's report saying the cause of death was cranial penetration by a rifle bolt due to unplanned rapid disassembly. As it is, the cite on Wiki leads only to the same video you posted. Excellent answer anyways.
    – Mazura
    May 26, 2018 at 2:06
  • @Mazura Don't worry, the safest place to be remains behind your rifle. I included the Ross, in part, to show just how difficult it is to sabotage a rifle to send anything flying out the back, even on a misassembled, badly designed, 100 year old rifle. That's why we won't find any coroner's reports. But it's important to note they limited themselves to errors in the field. If they really wanted to they could have gotten that bolt to fly out the back by sheering off most of the locking lugs and weakening the bolt stop. It was the most plausible thing I thought of when I saw the question.
    – Schwern
    May 26, 2018 at 3:16

Disclaimer: I'm not a weapons-expert, this is just a guess based on the little I know about weapons.

While the other two answers concentrated on failure of the barrel, bolt or other parts, this can be actually achieved without any failure (apart from the fact that the fired bullet shouldn't leave the muzzle in whichever way).

A pretty common reloading-mechanism of modern assault-rifles and basically any other (semi-)automatic rifle is gas-operated reloading. In this mode a part of the explosive power of the charge used to propel the bullet is redirected to the mechanism to load the next bullet into the chamber and eject the old case. The best known rifles using this mechanism are the AK-47 and AR-15.

This reloading-mechanism has the side-effect of redirecting part of the energy of the combusting propelant back towards the operator. Normally this would be used to operated the reloading-mechanism, but it could surely be modified in a way that allows propelling a bullet in the direction of the shooter and seriously injuring or killing them.

EDIT: In this scenario, the original bullet (the one in the chamber) should be stopped by other means before leaving the barrel. The projectile that is supposed to hit the gunman is placed in the gastube and will be propelled by the energy that would normally be used to reload the gun (probably reinforced by a larger pipe and bigger port).

  • I don't know about propelling a bullet in the direction of the shooter, but our resident retired Marine sniper says, "The most common I have seen are overpacking the rounds and not properly configuring the gas tubes." +1
    – Mazura
    May 25, 2018 at 21:40
  • There's no way the gas port could influence the bullet to such a degree because the majority of the gas doesn't get delivered until after the bullet has cleared it on account of it riding the blast wave, so to speak. The best you can do is overload the piston/gas key, causing mischief.
    – Veskah
    May 25, 2018 at 23:16
  • 2
    @Veskah the point isn't to redirect the bullet using the gasport, but to use the pressure in the gas-port to propel another projectile. Basically the idea is to use the gasport as an additional barrel, instead of it's more common use. What's happening with the original bullet is a completely different story, but shouldn't matter once it cleared the connection to the gastubes
    – user64384
    May 25, 2018 at 23:21
  • "The projectile that is supposed to hit the gunman is placed in the gastube". The Ruger Mini-14 in the film has no gas tube, it uses an operating rod. If it did, gas tubes are very narrow and would not be able to hold a meaningful projectile. Making it large enough to hold a significant projectile and tap enough gas to propel it at a meaningful velocity would look very suspicious.
    – Schwern
    May 26, 2018 at 3:28
  • @Schwern I don't think the projectile needs to be large or move extraordinarily fast, considering that it's supposed to wound the person holding the gun. Tapping enough gas shouldn't be too hard if the bullet blocks the barrel once it cleared the gas-port. A few pellets should probably do at that distance to at least significantly wound the operator. Didn't know about that the rifle in the movie used an operating-rod. So using the gastube is out of question, but I suppose there are ways around that
    – user64384
    May 26, 2018 at 14:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .