Even in the pre-internet age, I found it astonishing and annoying that in the UK local cinemas would post the week's - one week only - listings on a Thursday. So if you wanted to know what might be on a Friday, you could only find out the day before. Still, back then information wasn't so readily available so I just accepted it as one of those things.

However, even now, when everything you could want to know is only a click away, most cinemas still only post lists a week in advance. You can now get a week ahead of any given day which is a small improvement, but not much.

Given how inconvenient this is to consumers, I presume there must be a good reason for this - either a distribution or scheduling issues with films themselves or some marketing benefit to cinemas themselves. What is it? And do cinemas in other countries follow the same behaviour?

  • 3
    Here in the US, movie theaters vary in how far in advance they announce their showtimes. For a few illuminating comments, check out this Ask Metafilter thread. Basically, many movie theaters don't know what their schedule is going to be for a particular weekend until the Tuesday or Wednesday before. As I write this it's Tuesday; some local theaters have announced showtimes for this coming Friday, and some haven't. Feb 6 '18 at 17:35
  • For some of the biggest, most anticipated, films, such as Star Wars, it is possible to book a few weeks in advance - at my local chain multiplex anyway.
    – Mr_Thyroid
    Feb 12 '18 at 18:10
  • Which cinemas are you referring to? Odeon has 2 weeks of listings, all my local independent cinemas have over a month of listings. Feb 13 '18 at 23:20

I'd assume that most cinema visits are fairly "spur of the moment" decisions, often not planned more than a day or so in advance. Yes, there are exceptions, e.g. people wanting to view the latest installment of a popular franchise on opening day. So there's little point in posting "definite" schedules weeks in advance.

Moreover, such strict schedules would interfere with a movie unexpectedly becoming a hit: there's a rush of visitors but the cinema cannot accommodate them due to an arbitrarily compiled schedule weeks ago. Meanwhile another movie is under-performing and that same cinema ends up with nearly empty theaters. Thus they need wiggle room and must be able to shift movies to smaller or bigger theaters depending on demand, or change schedules to allow for more showings etc.

  • 2
    We find that ticket sales are either 1-2 days in advance or 1-2 hours in advance. Rarely are tickets sold in the interim. We do typically sell more tickets 1-2 hours out than 1-2 days out, except for movies like Star Wars where everyone knows they better get them early or miss out.
    – theMayer
    Mar 27 '18 at 15:36
  • 1
    I should point out that this really doesn't affect the schedule week-of. Schedules are finalized on Monday, and even with advance sales, it can still be difficult to predict a hit. Sometimes you just didn't schedule enough showtimes. It happens, and there isn't too much that can be done unless you have 10+ screens in your theater.
    – theMayer
    Mar 28 '18 at 16:34

In multi-screen cinemas, it is hard to predict long term demand for each movie

The core reason why cinemas don't list movies a long time in advance in the UK (except for the weeks movies are released) is that future demand is hard to predict and cinemas like to have the flexibility to adjust their viewings to the movies with the largest demand.

Nobody knows weeks in advance what the customers want to see (which is rule number one in the industry at least among William Goldman's readers). If they did we wouldn't get catastrophes like Mars Needs Moms or John Carter. We can tell when the first week is (and therefore announce it in advance) but after that, the showings will depend on how many people still want to see the movie. A disastrous first week will see the movie with drawn and something else put in its place the following week. A lower than expected turnout for a major release might see the movie reduced to one or two screens (it might launch in 5 or 6 screens in a big multiscreen cinema if the expectation is it will be a very popular blockbuster like Star Wars: the Last Jedi.)

But in an environment that is fairly unpredictable, cinemas will make more money if they have the flexibility to use their screens for the movies that have proved to have the largest demand. In a 15-screen multiplex there will be a mix of large and small screens. Movies that have demand but not blockbuster demand will move to small screens. Movies with too little demand last week will be dropped altogether.

This is much easier to do than it used to be now that most distribution is digital. The costs of adding an extra screen are small (you don't need an extra film print just an extra hard drive). The investment to get the movie on many screens to start with is low leading to much lower regret costs per screening (if you have a lot of expensive reels of film there is more incentive to keep plugging the movies to pay off the distribution costs).

In short, theatres look at the popularity of a movie on release and then decide what will be screened the next week to maximise their revenue. So they can't usually publish their full screening schedule a long time in advance.

  • "you don't need an extra film print just an extra hard drive" Again: this is nonsense. Films are located on a central server. At most they'll need extra decryption keys.
    – BCdotWEB
    Feb 13 '18 at 0:29
  • @BCdotWEB some are distributed on hard drives, some directly. Both are vastly cheaper and faster than print to distribute which is the point.
    – matt_black
    Feb 13 '18 at 0:51
  • @BCdotWEB But, yes, a lot of distribution is over fast data connections (we've been broadcasting live events to cinemas for more than a decade.)
    – matt_black
    Feb 13 '18 at 20:32
  • @matt_black - most theaters receive their initial copy via satellite, then replicate it out to the most likely houses to play it (that way, if there's an issue, they can move it to another theater without waiting 20-30 mins for network transfer). We receive keys for every projection system for every movie (e.g. a 20-screen receives 20 keys for every title).
    – theMayer
    Mar 27 '18 at 15:38

Assuming the business works the same in the UK as it does in the US, it simply isn't a priority to worry about the schedule 2-3 weeks out.

First, release dates change. Yes, this may sound surprising, but what is expected to be one of the year's biggest movies -- Avengers: Infinity War -- just changed its release date up one week due to the unexpected huge success of Black Panther. A series of changes followed, with Rampage moving its release date as well, and a handful of other changes to the schedule. Had I programmed my showtimes for a month out, I would have been frustrated by this. So, why do it?

Second, auditorium choice is not known. While it's usually pretty obvious that a movie like "Avengers" is going to get the big house, plus a few more (if you're a 20-screen, for example), it's not known how to distribute those other movies around. Do you move Black Panther down to a 60-seat house? Do you keep it in two 100-seat houses? With Star Wars opening, how many screens am I going to allocate for it at a given show time? Does Greatest Showman need a bigger theater? Do I need to space the showtimes out more to allow for larger crowds to efficiently access the concession stand?

Demand for the upcoming week is best gauged by looking at the immediately preceding weekend. This means the schedule gets finalized on Monday at the earliest - some theaters update their schedule as late as the day before, usually to add shows.

Major releases usually have a single auditorium posted a month in advance. You'll often see theaters put tickets on sale for the big movies - Star Wars, Avengers, etc. - this is done in anticipation that the movie will play in one or more of the biggest houses. These schedules can easily be set, because it's obvious that a Star Wars movie is going to be the biggest show of the weekend, and probably the weekend after. Studios actually schedule their competing product around this fact. So, it's easy to put these out weeks in advance.


Money. It's not UK thing. It's a European thing (where cinemas are independent from production companies).
There is a finite amount of copies that are available. And cinemas have to wait for their copies to arrive and distribute through their screens. And because on the weekends they have the biggest attendance they need to fix biggest income they can get (because on the first week only 10% goes to cinema pocket, rest go to distributor) with the possibility to do so.

And example. Valentine days 2018 fall on Wednesday. What is premiering on "valentine day"? New Gray movie. Does he really premier on valentine like he is advertised? No, they premiere it week before because attendance on the next week will be probably close to nothing. BUT, no we have opening weekend (that give a lot of money to distributor) and we have Valentines day that may earn a lot of money for the cinema (in popcorn money).

So then the cinema decide if they want to go screening Gray some more (with possible low income while hogging the screen) or want to show something new that will give them more profit (because the new movie will bring popcorn money).

So why they decide on Thursday? Because it's the day they can be sure they will have hard copy on their hands so they can schedule showing the movie. Yes, in the age of streaming, the digital movies are distributed on hard drives with seals so they will not leak. And the hard drives sometimes don't work, sometimes are broken, sometimes instead of 15 there are only 12 of them. And for cinema it's the worst case that they announce screening, pople come and the movie is not there.

  • 2
    Whatever makes you think they need x amount of hard drives? They get ONE hard drive and a number of decryption keys. The encrypted movie gets uploaded to the cinema's central server, and each projector connects to that server. Your entire scenario is partly incorrect, and the rest describes an exceptional situation. Nothing you say answers the question.
    – BCdotWEB
    Feb 6 '18 at 12:17
  • @BCdotWEB Personal experience and this thread imgur.com/a/hTjrV Feb 6 '18 at 12:24
  • @SZCZERZOKŁY Hard drives are a lot cheaper than full 35mm prints. Money is not a limitation with digital distribution.
    – matt_black
    Feb 9 '18 at 11:24
  • @matt_black It's not about cost of device you put movie on. It's about possibility to earn money vs. the limitation of the device, it's delivery to certain cinema. Feb 9 '18 at 11:54
  • I think the "print count" is limited more by the studio agreements with companies like Deluxe/Technicolor, who probably charge based on the maximum number of theaters. There is no other rational explanation for why studios would intentionally limit theater counts.
    – theMayer
    Mar 27 '18 at 15:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .