11

I wonder if it is considered as plagiarism, if 2 heroes from 2 different movies have the same power or such.

For example, Storm from Marvel X-Men is well-known by her powers to control weather and so on. Let's say, if studio ABC makes a new movie, features "Laura" with the same powers like Storm's, more or less, will Marvel sue them for stealing their "fictional superpowers". Just curious.

  • 17
    Erm...Quicksilver=The Flash etc? – Paulie_D Nov 1 '17 at 12:54
  • 3
    Shazam and Superman? Or Superman and Hancock? :) – Sean Duggan Nov 1 '17 at 12:55
  • 16
    Oh...Marvel...Norse mythology is suing you! – Paulie_D Nov 1 '17 at 13:00
  • 2
    NBC's Heroes had characters with powers that could be found in both Marvel and DC (the powers, not the characters). – Jack B Nimble Nov 1 '17 at 13:12
  • 11
    @Paulie_D - I believe "smiting," not litigation, is how issues were resolved in Asgard. – PoloHoleSet Nov 1 '17 at 15:25
39

Plagarism... NO.

Plagiarism is using someone else's work without giving proper credit.

Copyright infringement... Possibly.

Copyright infringement is using someone else's work without getting that person's permission. The author of any original work, including books, essays, Web pages, songs, pictures, and videos, automatically gets the copyright to that work, even if she doesn't label it with the copyright symbol and her name.

Source

The issue is that "powers" are usually generic (run fast, really strong, control weather, shrinking, getting really large, etc.) or based on existing myths. Unless the character is actually being copied (with perhaps a name change) it's unlikely that a suit would succeed.

That said, such things are vetted during production for legal conflicts and the production company would have looked into these things ahead of time.

If something was likely to cause a conflict then usually representations would be made, probably in the form of a "Cease and Desist" letter putting the offender on notice.

Actually suing is expensive and the only people who really win are the lawyers.

DC & Marvel have "competing" characters going back decades and this has rarely led to actual legal action.

Of course, with "movie money" now at stake... that might change.

  • 5
    DC and Marvel both have enough lawyers to tie any suits up in court and make it too expensive for the other to be profitable in a suit. When Joe Schmoe Comics Inc. tries, however, that would be another story. – corsiKa Nov 2 '17 at 1:10
6

According to Wikipedia there was a

...Second Circuit trilogy of 20th century copyright infringement cases in which the proprietors of Superman copyrights sued other companies for publishing fictional exploits of a cape-wearing superhero.

(Believe it or not) the first two were successful, but the third was not:

  • 3
    The justification in the third case was that even though they have similar powers, their personalities were significantly different: Superman is heroic, Hinkley is reluctant and bumbling. The point is that it's not just the powers that matter, it's the similarity of many aspects. – Barmar Nov 2 '17 at 3:35
  • 2
    I guess that's why Hancock wasn't Superman - Hancock was kind of a jerk. Okay, completely a jerk. – Wayne Werner Nov 2 '17 at 14:01
  • Appears the first one was something of a "half win" or what not... – rogerdpack Nov 2 '17 at 18:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .