I haven't watched the Blade Runner movie before. Nonetheless, I already got my tickets for the Blade Runner 2049 for Thursday screening. My question is, do I need to watch the original to understand the sequel? And also when I google Blade Runner, I see two different versions of it, Blade Runner and Blade Runner - Final Cut. Should I watch both before I go into the 2049 to have good knowledge of the characters and the movie?

Could anyone shed some light on it?

  • 3
    It is always nice to have some context, for that reason I would say you should, but in all honesty, you will be able to follow the story without it, you just might not get some of the "contextual" references, but that shouldn't entirely leave you lost either. Oct 4, 2017 at 20:24
  • @GµårÐïåñ Cool. Thank you. I will definitely try to watch it.
    – ShellZero
    Oct 4, 2017 at 20:29
  • 2
    I would recommend watching it too. I would not bother with the original Theatrical version, and go for either the Director's Cut or the Final Cut. There are at least 5 versions you can get your hands on.
    – iandotkelly
    Oct 4, 2017 at 20:55
  • 2
    @DukeZhou ... interviews that I've read indicate that it doesn't matter which version you consider this a sequel of - I'm purely saying that I consider the Theatrical version weaker as a movie overall. Unfortunately since i've not seen it yet, I don't know whether I believe that or not - hence not posting an answer.
    – iandotkelly
    Oct 4, 2017 at 21:35
  • 1
    Can't believe that the special effects of the original are still stunning, visually, considering how long ago that movie was made. It was mind-blowing to see it on the big screen (compared to other stuff that was out/available) back then. Oct 4, 2017 at 21:41

2 Answers 2


The director says it's not necessary to see Blade Runner first

Director Denis Villeneuve said that he intended for it to be accessible to first time viewers.

"That was one of the challenges ... to create a movie that would be in total relationship to the first one, but could stand on its own," he said when we met to discuss the film in London recently. "I will say that people don't need to see the first movie to understand my movie."

—"Do I need to watch 'Blade Runner' before seeing the sequel?", CNET, October 4, 2017 (Emphasis mine)

But he thinks you should see it anyway because it's really good

"I would recommend [seeing] the first movie because I think it's a masterpiece," Villeneuve says. "One of the things I said to myself that could be a positive effect of doing [the sequel] is to to put back the spotlight on the original movie, for the generation that are too young to have seen it on a big screen or even at home.

—"Do I need to watch 'Blade Runner' before seeing the sequel?", CNET, October 4, 2017

Either the Theatrical Cut or Final Cut is sufficient

Villeneuve has said that the Theatrical Cut and Final Cut have different thematic elements and Blade Runner 2049 is "in between" (minor spoilers):

"The key to making [Blade Runner 2049] was to be in between," Vileneuve said. "[The theatrical version] is the story of a human falling in love with an artificial being, and the story of [the director's cut] is a replicant who doesn’t know he’s a replicant and slowly discovers his own identity. Those are two different stories."

—"Which Cut Is Blade Runner 2049 a Sequel To?", Den of Geek!, August 25, 2017

CNET's Richard Trenholm says you can watch either, since the major plot difference isn't critical to the sequel.

In terms of getting ready for the sequel, either would work. Fans deride the Theatrical Cut for its over-explaining voiceover and studio-imposed happy ending, but it still packs a punch if that's the only version you have access to. The Final Cut removes the voiceover and, more importantly, creates ambiguity around who is or isn't an android -- but that theme isn't critical to the sequel, so the choice is yours.

—"Do I need to watch 'Blade Runner' before seeing the sequel?", CNET, October 4, 2017

GQ's Scott Meslow recommends the Final Cut because the original director, Ridley Scott, personally oversaw it.

So there are like 27 versions of this movie, right? How many of them do I actually need to watch?

Just one! And Ridley Scott made it pretty easy to remember, because it’s the one called Blade Runner: The Final Cut. After years of confusion about the "real" version of Blade Runner, The Final Cut was released in 2007 to provide a single, definitive of Blade Runner. Scott personally oversaw a brand-new remaster of the original movie.

—"Everything You Need to Know About Blade Runner Before Blade Runner 2049", GQ, September 28, 2017

I haven't seen any recommendations to watch both before seeing Blade Runner 2049, unless you are personally interested in seeing the difference.

If you don't have time to watch the original, you can watch some short prequel films

There are three short films created as prequels to Blade Runner 2049 in order to promote the film and expand on the world. If you just want to get a sense of what the world is like, this is a good jumping on point.

  • I agree. I rewatched the theatrical version of the original and then shorts & 2049.
    – lal
    Oct 9, 2017 at 13:48

After watching the movie I have to say that to get the full experience from the movie you absolutely have to watch the original (I watched the Final Cut) and the three short films that were released this year.

Thing is: a lot of major plot-points revolve around the events of these other products in a big way for the original movie and smaller but mutually enriching for the shorties.

I hope you didn't go out there unprepared for the BR 2049 because otherwise you risk to not only understand but build up a required emotional attachment to certain characters.

The fact that the director Denis Villeneuve said that "it's not necessary to watch the original" is probably based around the fears that it might scare off people with it's slow pacing and vagnuess which ironically the new picture inherits. But fret not! The new movie is polished enough to be enjoyable from the get go and provides all the necessary information (unlike the old picture) to understand the plot assuming that you've watched all there is to watch and paid attention.

  • 1
    +1 Yesterday, I walked into the movie without watching the original. I did understand the whole movie but I was missing some character context for sure. I think if I would have watched the original, it would have been better.
    – ShellZero
    Oct 6, 2017 at 20:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .