Since I served in the U.S. military, it rankles me to hear female officers in Hollywood productions addressed (non-sarcastically) as "sir" (instead of "ma'am," or their proper rank or title).

Can “sir” be used to address female officers? confirms that in reality there is no precedent for a "gender-neutral" usage of the honorific "sir."

Some answers to What's the origin of referring to female superior officers as “sir”? suggest that this stage usage might have originated intentionally with Star Trek. For example, it would be consistent with a sci-fi work like Starship Troopers that features a striking emphasis on gender equality.

Although I can't enumerate them at the moment, I know that I have heard this quirk in many police and military productions spanning numerous genres and time periods. With parodies like The Orville I could believe it's intentional. But in serious police and military dramas: Is this just a product of some self-perpetuating ignorance of screenwriters and producers? Or is it done intentionally for some reason?

3 Answers 3


A lot of movies and TV shows that you see that in are futuristic and sci-fi movies. Part of the purpose is to just grab your attention like it does, but the other purpose is to show how they are different from our modern military.

In essence, they are saying that they have moved beyond gender bias to the point that every officer is just referred to as "Sir."

Probably the best recent example is the remake of Battlestar Galactica series.

Some fictional settings assume that in the future such distinctions would be dropped in favor of a consistent honorific. I doubt this will ever be the case. But changes always happen, so maybe in a few decades that young female Ranger LT will be called "Sir" by her troops.

Refer to this question from English Stack Exchange: Can sir be used to address female officers. In the American military, you would never address a female officer as "Sir."

In the United States, you would address the officer as "Ma'am" and not "Sir". It's considered disrespectful to use the term "Sir" for a female in both the army/navy and outside.

The only place I've ever heard female officers called "Sir" is in futuristic fiction, e.g. Star Trek. But even there it's not universal. Apparently even some fictional female officers dislike being called "Sir." According to this Trekkie page she was primarily called "Captain" but by protocol she was supposed to be called "Sir."

In the American TV series Castle, all of the detectives (both male and female) address Captain Victoria Gates as "Sir."

  • 2
    If I recall correctly, Captain Gates in Castle explicitly told people to call her "sir" when the character was introduced. Sep 20, 2017 at 10:51
  • 1
    The correct answer is contained in this one line: "they are saying that they have moved beyond gender bias to the point that every officer is just referred to as 'Sir.'" Sep 20, 2017 at 11:27
  • @AnthonyGrist: Extending your counterexample, I seem to remember multiple instances of hard-ass female officers being called "Sir". I think this is in-character for them, as tend to have a very male attitude in general which makes them equally respected. Even in stories where gender stereotypes exist, hard-ass military females are often accepted as an equal (which makes a statement about how much of a hard-ass they must invariably be). The only example I can think of right now is Olivier Mira Armstrong, but there should be many more.
    – Flater
    Sep 20, 2017 at 12:37
  • weird, when I was in the army 25 years ago, we were told to address ALL officers as Sir, never mind the gender. Sep 20, 2017 at 15:25

With reference to the mere mention of Star Trek in your question; I'm going to answer this with credit to the answer of the Sci-Fi SE answer to this question:

What's the origin of referring to female superior officers as "sir"?

With credit to Praxis(Sci-Fi SE user), this is their answer with a score of 19:

Professor De Witt Douglas Kilgore, a specialist in English literature and cultural representation at Indiana University, has done significant research on race, gender, and equality in speculative fiction. In his book Astrofuturism: Science, Race, and Visions of Utopia in Space (2010), he attributes calling females "sir" to Star Trek :

The Star Trek franchise reinforced this idea by the convention of awarding its female officers the honorific "sir". This innovation was established in the second Star Trek film, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, dir. Nicholas Meyer, Paramount, 1982.

Likely, Kilgore is actually making reference to the use of "Mister Saavik" in the film, and perhaps equating it to "sir". At the very least, as "mister" is a male title, it foreshadows the use of "sir" in later Star Trek works. In any case, Kilgore's research suggests that we owe the use of "sir" as a bi-gender honorific to Star Trek, whether it first occurred in The Wrath of Khan or a few years later in TNG, at least as far as science fiction is concerned.


The reason a lot of sci-fi shows and Star Trek specifically use 'sir' is because they are evolutions/branches of the Navy. The US Navy does not use "Ma'am", and everyone is addressed as "Sir".

  • 4
    Welcome to Movies.SE! Considering that - as you've noted - your answer contradicts the existing ones, would you be able to provide some evidence that your answer is correct? JM's answer cites the fact that you would not call a female military officer "Sir", and feetwet cites his own personal experience in the US military.
    – F1Krazy
    Aug 26, 2022 at 13:14
  • Sir, yes sir. Aye Aye, Sir. A very junior enlisted reacts to the uniform and the rank, not the person behind it. Once you've gained time and experience, you'll expand your 'view', but the correct response to an order is Sir, yes sir.
    – CGCampbell
    Aug 26, 2022 at 14:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .