5

In Mel Gibson's previous films concerning religion and faith there were always some elements included that established the existence of God beyond doubt. In the film "Signs" (2002) there were miraculous elements like Graham's dying wife had instructed him how to defeat an alien and then Bo's whim to put everywhere glasses with water had helped even further to defeat that alien. At the end of the film the director leaves no doubt that God exists regardless of whether characters believe it or not. The same relates to "The Passion of the Christ" (2004) film, except that the existence of God is established at the very beginning of the film.

In this regard the "Hacksaw Ridge" is very different. There are no miracles placed in the film, that could hint at the existence of God, except for the Desmond Doss' feat itself, which is interpreted as a miracle by his fellow soldiers, but the director seems to leave the question open as to whether it was a sign of God or an extraordinary human performance. Gibson never gives a definite answer to that question in the film.

And having left that open, he kind of proposed an idea that faith is a matter of choice. The characters in the film do not know for a fact that God exists. They choose to believe. The same way Gibson leaves the audience to choose for themselves if the feat was a sign of God, a miracle or not.

And then this idea of choice in reinforced by a story of Desmond Doss, who is shown to be a very religious man, who would rather go to jail than transgress a commandment. As the film progresses, first Desmond refused to even hold a rifle despite a threat of being sent to jail, then he chose to hold a rifle when he needed to save his commander's life. First he refused to work on a Saturday, because that would violate a commandment, but then he chose to violate this commandment in order to participate in a battle.

Gibson treats the commandments in the film not as an absolute obligation (the Law of God), but as something that can be chosen to obey or disobey depending on the circumstances.

So does this film push an idea that faith is a matter of choice and there is no knowing if God exists or not?

closed as primarily opinion-based by Mr. Kennedy, Paulie_D, A J, John, Meat Trademark Jul 29 '17 at 9:33

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • this films is all about man and his courage and his dedication. just an idea, may be it's the way in this how Gibson's view on god illustrated, in other hand, main character always had an utmost belief in god. so about the opinion about the god, it could be how viewer sees the movie – Vishwa Jul 25 '17 at 3:43
  • I am thinking more like maybe through the film Gibson translates the progression of his own views, that now he might have come to the point where he starts to question his own faith. – and his dog Jul 25 '17 at 3:56
  • it's a biopic, not a gnostic treatise. – Mr. Kennedy Jul 29 '17 at 4:27
  • It is based on a true story, but it also changes the original story substantially. For dramatic or artistic effect. It is not a documentary. It's a work of art. And in every good work of art, a creator usually tries to communicate his or her own ideas. Take for example the "Braveheart" (1995), it is also based on some historic events, but it mostly is fiction and is valued for it's ideas. – and his dog Jul 29 '17 at 5:41
  • 1
    And by the way, your statement that biopic films can not convey any ideas of their makers, is not only subjective, but is also false. – and his dog Jul 29 '17 at 7:59

Browse other questions tagged .