21

After Farrier saves the lives of many on the sea coast in Dunkirk, and his fuel is off, he lands smoothly in the enemy zone and puts the plane on fire and gets himself captured.

Why did he hesitate to open the parachute and escape?

  • 1
    screenrant.com/… – chaitanya89 Jul 24 '17 at 8:48
  • 2
    I don't think the link explains anything I asked. – noobmaster69 Jul 26 '17 at 5:12
  • 1
    But, he could've just glided into the water instead of onto the beach and be rescued by one of the boats, right? – Robin Aug 5 '17 at 2:13
19

I'm not a pilot but from my readings they'd much rather make a safe landing than jump from a plane they can land even if there was the possibility of capture.

Jumping/parachuting from a fighter was not an easy process during WW2. Firstly, you had to be a lot higher and climb out of the aircraft while still flying level (which is hard to do since there was no automatic pilot) nor were their ejector seats in early WW2.

In general, it involved (if my reading is correct), for the most part, inverting the aircraft and falling out.

Here's a reddit thread comment

So, your cockpit is not on fire, you have a few seconds to spare, you can act methodically instead of frantically.

First of all, jettison the canopy. Don't just open it, because due to some odd factors it might close back again. We have time to spare, but no time to lose.

You also need to unbuckle your seat-belts and don't forget to detach your radio cable and oxygen supply. If you forget, it might prevent you from leaving the aircraft. Again, no time to lose. Now, do you have aileron authority? You do? Great, perform a half barrel roll. Now you will simply fall out of the cockpit, also minimizing the risk of hitting the vertical or horizontal stabilizer (though the risk will always be there, this is exactly what killed Hans Joachim Marseille, in my opinion the best fighter pilot of WW2).

If you cannot roll the plane on its back, you have to climb out of the cockpit onto the wing and just jump. Be careful as the air striking your body will try to force you back into the cockpit. If one wing is angled downward, you can attempt to slide down on it just a little bit to avoid the stabilizers.

Now, you're in the air. When do you open the chute? It depends. You might want to do it immediately, but not necessarily. Say we're in the Battle of Britain. If you're an Allied pilot and there are Luftwaffe planes near, wait as long as you can since they might attempt to shoot you out of the sky. Also, if you're near the Channel and the wind is blowing towards it, wait as long as you can so as not to be blown over the water. And if you're falling from very high up, you might want to wait a bit so as not to die of boredom during the long descent.

Gliding an aircraft, out of fuel, would have been much safer.

Even if he did jump..where's he going go? He's essentially alone in occupied France...he's going get captured anyway.

  • This infact makes sense with the other pilot not opening parachute as well, also his cockpit roof gets jammed 😁 – noobmaster69 Jul 22 '17 at 23:30
  • 3
    hm, nice answer! Where's he going go? if he could he would open the parachute and escape in zone where allied forces were. It was even shown that everybody was cheering for him. Btw, I was thinking that... it was said that their planes are the best ones so Farrier just burnt to the ground in order not to give any information about technology to Germans... But it really makes sense if gliding an aircraft would have been much safer. – Lust_For_Love Jul 24 '17 at 8:06
6

He once thought about opening his parachute. But on a second thought, he did not want the Allied to see the aircraft go down, which would affect the Allied's spirit negatively. Then he decided to sacrifice himself.

  • Also it could be, Farrier did not want the plane to be crashed at the enemy zone, where they could find any intel, so he safely lands it and burns it down. – chaitanya89 Jul 26 '17 at 8:32
-3

Other answers are just twisting facts to convince people that the plot of the movie was technically correct.

I think it was totally a play with emotions. Imagine he actually jumped from the aircraft and survived. You know that there were really high chances of survival if you are not blinded by your faith in the technical aspects of the plot.

That would have been a dull(but happy) ending. The makers of the movie probably felt it to be a better ending to show a hero saving a lot of people and then surrendering himself in the hands of the enemy.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .