Spoiler alert for the last few episodes of House of Cards Season 5.

Why did Frank and Doug secretly agree to pass on leaks to Tom Hammerschmidt implicating Doug in Zoe's murder?

Tom didn't really have anything concrete with regards to Zoe's death, so why did Frank bother? I understand it was so there could be no question of Underwood's involvement, but like I said, Tom didn't have anything concrete, and nor did anyone else.

2 Answers 2


In the last episode (S05E13) Frank explains to Claire that he was the leak to Tom Hammerschmidt because he saw that nobody was going to stop and eventually enough information would get out that he would constantly be questioned.

So, instead of leaving his fate in the hands of fate, he decided that he wanted to control the situation.

He leaked info so that it looked like Doug killed Zoe, instead of himself, and then Claire would pardon Doug anyways, so then anything that Tom Hammerschmidt had would be useless.

Even though Tom Hammerschmidt didn't have anything concrete, Claire had confessed to Tom Yates, and Frank didn't know that she had killed Tom Yates. So, as far as Frank knew, there was always doubt and always at least 1 person who knew too much.

So, again, instead of being left to the whims of whoever had the motivation to try and keep creating doubt or questions about what happened to Zoe Barnes, Frank wanted to "control the narrative" and end things on his own terms.

At the end of the episode, though, two new issues cropped-up that mess-up Frank's plans:

  1. Claire didn't pardon Frank or Doug -- so now they're both still potentially able to go to prison.

  2. Tom Hammerschmidt -- during his team meeting -- started to realize that everything was falling together almost "too easily", and now has doubts as to whether Doug actually did anything. He isn't fully aware of it, yet, but he's starting to realize that he (Tom H.) might be being used as a pawn.

So, similar to his resigning due to the committee constantly questioning him and undermining his legitimacy as President -- due to accusations of being corrupt and paying to win the election -- Frank knew that constant doubt and questioning (even from 1 person) about Zoe Barnes would never end. So, by working with Doug to orchestrate his "confession", and then assuming Claire would pardon Doug, Frank could then control and close-out the narrative about Zoe.

After that, anyone looking into it would have to prove a new crime or new suspect, due to "Double Jeopardy" limitations against Doug.


Tom had the one time phone, didn't he? but you might argue it's not concrete enough. so I guess the move is to guarantee if anything explode the fire won't burn the Francis.

BTW, the sharp turning at the last episode is quite blunt. editors might want to move the focus to Claire, but asking Francis to quit presidency yet still claiming everything is under his control looks rather blunt. it doesn't feel like Francis.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .