I generally presume when a product is featured in a studio film that it is an intentional product placement. It seems like a lot of movies in the last decade have featured the Applebee's restaurant chain. I've never been to one - maybe they are amazing? - but I am wondering why so many studio comedies (with what are arguably A-list actors) have the restaurant featured.

Maybe I am just imagining a connection, but off the top of my head I can think of "Talladega Nights", Vince Vaughn's speech in "Couple's Retreat", "Hall Pass" and most recently "Why Him?"

Is there an in-joke I am missing that only Applebee's patrons are in on?

Is there a marketing deal with a particular production group or some other common thread between the films? (e.g. are they all 20th Century Fox films?)

Why Applebee's as opposed to Olive Garden, T.G.I.Friday's, Ruby Tuesday, Outback Steakhouse, Sizzler's, Benihana's or some other national chain?

Is it just because they are a fairly ubiquitous national chain, and essentially like using Budweiser if an American character is a non-discriminating beer drinker? Also, like Les Grossman drinking a Diet Coke, the particular product does say something about the characters that use the product. Why Applebee's in particular?

Or, is there a more mundane reason on the production deal end explaining why Applebee's in particular? Something like, for example, if Ben Stiller were an executive producer on all the films and he were a part owner of AppleBee's, or maybe there is some other less fiscal angle which is a common thread to all the movies which feature Applebee's? I appreciate how marketing works for the advertiser and the payment made for the ad time. If it were all the same & moviemakers "don't care" which product so long as they pay the most for the ad time, then why so many movies using Applebee's? If the market strategy were so effective, why aren't other chains competing for that ad space? Why the market share of advertising time for Applebee's as opposed to any other chain (or, simply making up a chain like Chotchkie's or Shenanigan's)?

  • 6
    I swear to God I'll pistol whip the next guy who says shenanigans.
    – J Doe
    Commented Mar 21, 2017 at 23:08

1 Answer 1


Applebee's is commercialised mostly in comedy and romance/action genres which is regarded as social movies, that you go watch with a group, because that defines the key elements of their customers.

For example in Couples Retreat you can find a discussion on going alone to Applebee´s or in commercial terms, they are trying to let you know, its not a place to go alone. It is a social place.

"You'll be sitting by yourself, eventually, at Applebee's, all alone. And who wants to go to Applebee's by themselves?"

In Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby Applebee´s is described for delicious food, a great place to share weekends gathering: family or friends.

In Hall Pass you can find a line:

"Are you guys sure that Applebee’s is the best place to meet hot, horny women at?"

In Tripadvisor it is commercialised as "Great place after the movies". Also multiple sites are offering Movie tickets + Applebee's dinner bundle/gift card.

I think you know the answer and somewhat you already answered it. To conclude its simply a product placement - nothing is accidental when it comes mentioned a product. Especially when Applebee's references usually lasts quite long. Having A-list studio comedies to give it good reference is the best advertisement you can have regarding the target group they have in mind and image they want to give themselves. Insight into Applebee's new image can be found HERE. Opposed to other chains, because they are his direct competitors over target group.

Why is Applebee's in so many movies? - Because product placement, if done right, pays off. Through movies Applebee's can design an image of themselves as social, active, upright and better than average restaurant. Although Applebee's sales have not increased compared to its competitors.

Addition to edited question: Although I feel this may be off-topic in this part of S.E.

"On the filmmakers’ side, specific brand choices for product placement are intuitive. Production or distribution firms, directors, producers, actors, or agents choose brands for product placement (Pulliam, 2012; Russell & Belch, 2005). On the advertisers’ side, many advertisers do not have clear, purposive objectives for their product placements and do not use product placement as part of the integrated marketing plan (Russell & Belch, 2005). Someone from the PR department, corporate communications, the director of advertising, or a brand manager makes product placement decisions (Russell & Belch, 2005).Given the fact that motion picture firms increasingly use product placement to offset production costs, it is imperative for motion picture firms to understand what types of movies place more products because this will allow motion picture firms to use product placement strategically." (page. 2-3, Source 1)

"In the context of films, genres classify movies into different categories. Genres are intrinsic cues in that they are a very essential attribute of a movie. The genres of a film are inseparable from the content and are among the most essential elements that determine the identity of a film. The genres of a film are determined before the production stage and are distinct cues that describe the characteristics of a movie. Genre is defined as “a type of plot according to commonalities within textual types and differences among them” (Feuer, 1992; Stern & Russell, 2004). page." (page. 4, Source 1)

As far as I have understand and know, usually the filmmaker knows the genre he is making and has insight in what type of product(s) could fit into it and describes the average watcher. After that he contacts simultaneously (unless he has specific brand in mind for specific reasons) with potential firms and presents his view how he can promote the product. And when there is leverage of direct competing firms on play, he lists others to whom he have made the same deal, after which he chooses best contract conditions and money received. (This is the most common and simplified version how such deals are struck)

Now coming back to AB case, it may be the case where filmmakers sought it out specifically - but I did not find any particular reason why just AB restaurant would be need for any of these scenes. I think its merely the case, that AB just paid the most price or offered best conditions - for example most firms do not allow mocking or hard joking over the brand, which in case of AB we can find clearly.

From economical point of view marketing only works when it is done in large scale (unless it is niche product). Therefore it seems quite logical that AB aim should be to be pictured in as many comedy romance/action movies as possible. They have a huge share in product placement compared to other chains, because probably this is their competing strategy. Whether it is effective is a matter of questions. For example 10-year revenue comparison does not show any significant growth for them (2,3), but we can also argue, that without product placement they would perform even worse. In my view restaurant product placement is not effective, as it has little impact of consumer choice compared to other solid products. And that´s why other restaurants may not be that interested in that.

1) Jiyoung Cha (2016): Product placement in movies: perspectives from motion picture firms, Journal of Media Business Studies, DOI: 10.1080/16522354.2016.1159802

  • Thanks for the thoughtful answer. Of course the product placement is effective marketing for Applebee's. Talladega Nights is over 10 years old - so the humor factor has played since long before the article you linked. What's the benefit to the movie vs. any other food chain?
    – MmmHmm
    Commented Mar 20, 2017 at 7:08
  • As far as I understand the humour factor is sign, that Applebee´s is not afraid to use clear and visible product placement (mostly it is used as hidden marker to trigger your subconsciousness). Secondly humour, even mocking, is much better remembered and perceived by those who recognise it. And its all about showing that "we are fun and cosy place to be". The benefit to the movie is only the money they are paying for it. Other than that I do not think they care what reference to food-chain they use.
    – Paharet
    Commented Mar 20, 2017 at 8:38
  • I agree that the finances are important, but - and especially with comedy - the way a product placement plays is also an important factor. If the moviemakers "don't care" it seems like there would be more restaurants competing for such lucrative advertising time.
    – MmmHmm
    Commented Mar 20, 2017 at 20:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .