Do I need to watch the first John Wick to understand John Wick 2?

Question

From my understanding, John Wick is a rather plot-light action movie (a guy goes on a rampage after someone kills his dog), but some friends of mine want to see John Wick 2 tonight and I haven't seen the first. Will I be lost at all, or is the plot light enough that I should be able to just sit back and enjoy the action?

Google returned nothing one way or another that could confirm this, as I was trying to avoid spoilers. Likewise, the second movie's Wikipedia page offers little in way of the plot.

Answer 1

You'll probably be a bit lost on some recurring characters, and how the assassin underworld is being run, contracts, honor, the Continental, and gold coins; though they didn't explain it much in detail in the first movie. You should be good on watching Chapter 2, for the action scenes.

I'll still recommend to watch the first one because it is a good movie, with Wick being stylish and efficient assassin which lives up to his reputation as a legend.

Answer 2

Do I need to see "John Wick" to understand "John Wick: Chapter 2"?

The 2nd film is "Chapter 2", and it lives up to the title, as it starts immediately after the first one ends.

Yes, there is an opening, pre-title, extended scene that has supporting-characters summarizing and expanding-upon the plot, events, and purpose of the first film. So technically speaking, you can watch "John Wick: Chapter 2" without having seen "John Wick", and you'll be given a cursory summation of where the story is at.

Plot-wise, there are some continuity throw-backs and relationships that you'll need to follow, but most of that is very blunt and very obvious to pick-up on.

Short answer: No. You can understand "John Wick: Chapter 2" without having seen "John Wick".

---

Do I need to see "John Wick" to (fully) enjoy "John Wick: Chapter 2"?

Personally, I don't care about guns, movie-murders, nor do I inherently enjoy violence.

If you do enjoy the specifics of guns and fancy reloading and aiming and movie-murders and mixed martial-arts, you might very well have different better or worse opinions, because they do introduce those things in the original and heavily emphasize (quadrupling-down on) all of them in "Chapter 2".

But what I enjoyed about "John Wick" was the artistry and the pacing. For a more "cerebral" and subtler take on similar topics, I whole-heartedly suggest you look for "The Rover" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2345737/). It's more satirical and philosophical, but has overlapping themes and plot elements.

So with enjoying "John Wick", for me it was about the craftswork of the shock-and-awe pacing of the stunts and actions, and the way the film presented itself as it was; nothing more and nothing less. It was surprising, intense, hilarious at times, and continuously shocking. Was it kind of ultimately stupid/pointless/vague ...? That's certainly debatable.

With "John Wick: Chapter 2", it takes on -- from my perspective -- this interesting role as being a far more literal continuation of the first film.

Without spoilers, everything that happens in the first film has now just finished happening hours if not minutes before the opening scene of "John Wick: Chapter 2". Because of everything John Wick just went through in the first film, he's now physically, emotionally, and mentally taxed. But again, he's thrown immediately into the events of the second film -- think: less humor, more struggle.

I would think you could enjoy Chapter 2 without having seen the original, but it's clearly at least an impending trilogy that is turning out more like a single 6 hour film. It's the classic kind of trilogy pacing. The first film is the setup and the surprise and wonder of a new universe. The second is like just a constant 2 hour battle with random, confusing plot jibberish thrown around as if we're supposed to be buying into the reality of the universe. And I'm fully expecting the third will be this dramatic coalescing of the first two, with this "ultimate" expression of the simple, basic truth ... don't fuck with John Wick. [Note this pacing with the original "Lord of the Rings" trilogy.]

It's by no means "too confusing", it's just that you're walking halfway in.

Answer 3

To add to Nochi's answer, the original does some work to describe a bit of John's background, but doesn't go into extensive detail. Basically, he was an excellent assassin/body guard that always got his mark/completed his mission and was rather famous in the criminal world until he retired.

Answer 4

If you just want to watch a stylish action flick, I don't think the first movie is necessary. But one of the amazing things about the first movie is the way it eases you into and immerses you in its surreal world.

There's a lot of mythos surrounding the events of the movie that it constantly hints at but rarely expands on, and my worry for people who have not seen it is that Chapter 2 will expand that mythology even further by building upon what was introduced in the first movie. In that case, you'll be left rather confused by the relationships, name drops, or other details.

But even ignoring all that I would suggest watching the first movie before the second, if for no other reason than it is a damn good movie.

Answer 5

I personally did not watch John Wick Chapter 1 but I watched Chapter 2 and 3 and completely understand it. Every chapter of John Wick has its own story. You can understand the story simply by watching its one chapter but if you want to enjoy it then you must watch all chapters because they are amazing and full of suspense.