0

In the movie Contact (1997) everything is revealed in the court hearing.

Specifically, everything is setup by S.R. Hadden (John Hurt's character) and there are no aliens, as expected.

But what's the reason of the last scene where it is shown that the tape recorded hours of nothing?!

Is it just because the director wants to say something religious, or did they want to leave the film open ended?

  • 1
    I didn't watch the film, but as you describe the ending, it matches that of the source book. So your question should be directed to Sagan, not the director. In the book, there are aliens, and the tape is wiped as well, but the ending is pretty definitive. – Gallifreyan Jan 11 '17 at 15:06
  • 2
    It already has, kinda - scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/78589/… – Paulie_D Jan 11 '17 at 15:14
12

The ending of Contact isn't really open ended but it does have a religious component.

Your assumption that "everything is done by [John Hurt]" is wrong. It is just said in court because nobody believes her. Jodie Fosters character Ellie is an atheist and has troubling handling people with religious views as there is no scientific proof for a god. Now that there is no scientific proof for her report she finds herself in the same position as religious people she talked before (like Matthew McConaugheys character).

However, the destroyed seat in the capsule and the hours of tape (the amount of hours taped actually match the estimated mission time from Ellies report) are undeniable proof for her report being correct. But this proof is withheld by the intelligence guys.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .