12

The 1980's film "Mazes and Monsters" is often cited along other materials as evidence of the dangers of pen-and-paper role-playing games; the film is a thinly-veiled fictionalized adaptation of the death and investigation of James Dallas Egbert III. It encouraged the panic against a growing gaming subculture.

Have any of those involved with the film (question includes, but is not constrained to, the film's star, Tom Hanks) ever apologized for creating material that helped ostracize many?

  • 3
    Art is art. One should never apologize for art. Did Nirvana apologize for killing the bank accounts of countless 80's Hair Metal bands? – Johnny Bones Oct 25 '16 at 14:32
  • 3
    @JohnnyBones - One could say that countless 80's Hair Metal bands did themselves in by being countless. – JoshDM Oct 25 '16 at 14:46
  • 3
    Considering the brutal interpretations and drastic changes Hollywood screenwriters have made and continue to make in basically every movie "based on a true story," I doubt it. Spend a little time researching other movies in this vein - some of the changes are truly horrifying in how they misrepresent real people just to tell a more interesting story. – Steve-O Nov 17 '16 at 18:57
  • Well the mainstream media/establishment will always exploit & ostracize any sub-culture interests or groups that do not conform to the perceived societal norms and this is regardless of any point in history. I was playing D&D when this TV movie originally came out and we all saw it and us being kids thought it to be rather silly. – michaelwishlow May 6 '17 at 0:20
  • 1
    A movie, based on a book, based loosely on a real event. Hardly anything to apologize for. – SiXandSeven8ths Oct 3 '18 at 20:39
3

It's hard to prove a negative, but I'm going to go out on a limb and say "No". I've looked up all the combinations of the cast and crew I can think of, and while I've found a lot of information from the time, and a lot of (relatively recent vintage) reviews of this quickly forgotten TV movie—and for all the hype about the book and movie's impact you'll see mentioned in these post-hoc retrospectives, its effects were highly localized—and I can't find anyone even mentioning it.

But we can also look at the type of novel and type of TV movie and see how often anyone apologizes for them, and it's pretty close to none. Wikipedia lists it as a social novel, which includes some classic novels like Uncle Tom's Cabin and Grapes of Wrath, but I put it more in the ripped-from-the-headline-exploitation category, like any random episode of "Law & Order", where the claim to be fiction allows libel with impunity. Or, say, "Valley of the Dolls", with its thinly disguised references to Judy Garland, Carole Landis and Ethel Merman.

There is a similar category of works that purports to be non-fiction, but isn't, or probably isn't, like Go Ask Alice, Coffee, Tea or Me? and House of 1,0000 Pleasures. It's all of a piece: Books and films turned out for a quick buck to exploit some current social issue.

Jaffe never apologized for it any more than she apologized for her other work, any more than Jacqueline Suzanne did, nor generally any of the people who worked on these things.

For those saying art isn't something that should be apologized for, I think it's legitimate to question the artistic aspirations at play here, and would further submit the artistic masterpieces of Birth of the Nation, Triumph of the Will and Escape (The Piña Colada Song): If you use your art to create a false impression of a group of people who end up being persecuted as a result—particularly as a result of your attempting to catch a pop trend, an apology is certainly warranted.

They Know What They Did

  • 1
    "If you use your art to create a false impression of a group of people who end up being persecuted as a result - particularly as a result of your attempting to catch a pop trend, an apology is certainly warranted." Excellent statement. – JoshDM Dec 28 '18 at 21:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .