12

Do directors have a voice in choosing movie posters, or is it always a producer or external choice? Even for different movie posters in different countries, do directors ever decide to use a specific image for their movies?

  • 4
    Distribution is usually a work done by producers (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_producer#Production for example). – mattiav27 Oct 16 '16 at 15:42
  • @mattiav27 Yes, I understand. But do producers "force" directors to use certain poster (they've invested money in the movie so they have the right to chose how to promote it) or do directors have sometimes the last word on this topic? – Spaceman Oct 20 '16 at 19:12
1

I'd say that directors do not have much input into designing the poster, since they are usually made by third-party design studios, with more then one of these usually competing to make the best and be chosen by the marketing staff of the movie studio.

Source

| improve this answer | |
-1

I'm a big fan of movie promos that used to be shown on TV. They were five to ten minutes or so, and gave the stars and director a chance to tell us how this was the best piece of art they ever been in . . . or something like that. Networks would broadcast them when a movie ran short, so if a ninety minute movie with John Wayne ran 1:50 with commercials, a promo of a new John Wayne movie would fill out the time slot, then two minutes of commercials, followed by the next show or late local news. Other promotional things might run, too. Not too often the director might talk about the poster and who did it. Never saw them claim any credit for promotional stuff, including poster.

I have seen interviews where directors claim they had no say or were forced to accept stuff for the sake of the movie. In "Heaven's Gate" the director Michael Cimino directed a cynical, self-indulgent take on a incident between cattlemen and sheep herders where one person died. The movie poster had the two leads, a flag, and the image of a man with a rifle claiming, "The only thing greater than their passion for America, was their passion for each other." There is no evidence anyone (characters) in the movie gave two hoots about America, including the director. If the Medved brothers are to be believed, the poster flowed from the studio trying to sell / salvage this movie--it didn't.

For most big budget flicks, the director makes the product, the producers and the studio package it. In smaller (budget) films, the lines are rather less formal, so the director may have other roles, including the poster. A powerful (money-making) director can have much more say over incidentals. Ultimately, no one person is ever in control, or you wouldn't have the possibly apocryphal translation of "Psycho" into "The Man Who Dressed Like His Mother."

| improve this answer | |
  • Your answer is a bit all over the place, mind cleaning it up to focus on directors decisions on posters? Preferrably with citations. – Luciano Apr 1 at 14:49
-2

This entertaining YouTube video reveals the psychology behind why movie posters look the way they do. It argues directors may not have much of a say.

| improve this answer | |
  • 6
    Thank you for assisting the community. It would be nice if you summarized the video, and how it is relevant to this question. I hope you enjoy participating. – John Dec 31 '16 at 21:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .