7

In The Conjuring 2 (2016), Janet is given water and told not to swallow it. The demon has complained that he will answer to the question if they don't see them in face.

So Ed Warren turns his back and questions the demon. So why did they use shallow focus technique on Ed Warren's role while taking to the demon? This makes us unable to see how demon is talking through girl with water in her mouth.

enter image description here

6

In addition to Ankit's answer. I believe the effect was done to add two things: special effects, and the element of the unknown.

Special Effects:

By leaving the image of the girl blurred, it became possible to add some special effects animation of the girl transforming into the old man. If you watch the blurry figure during this scene you can literally see the shape of her body change and even almost see the face of the ghost.

Unknown:

By this I am essentially referring to the common horror trope of not showing the monster or supernatural element. The whole "fear of the unknown" and how that can often be more suspenseful and scary than actually showing it in detail. (See "Nothing Is Scarier" trope) By not being able to see exactly what is happening, the viewer is left mostly to their own imagination of what horrors might actually be occurring in the background.

  • Can you get some images for the special effect scene, anyways +1 – Ankit Sharma Aug 30 '16 at 6:10
  • @AnkitSharma I don't own the film but I'll see what I can find. – sanpaco Aug 30 '16 at 15:40
5

It was used to give the benefit of doubt in the mind of audience.

The original case of Enfield Poltergeist was also quite vague in terms of interpretation of being a real Poltergeist story or just a hoax.

The Enfield Poltergeist is the name given to the claims of poltergeist activity at a council house in Brimsdown, Enfield, England from 1977 to 1979 involving two sisters, ages 11 and 13. Some members of the Society for Psychical Research such as inventor Maurice Grosse and writer Guy Lyon Playfair believed the haunting to be genuine, while others such as professors of psychology Anita Gregory and John Beloff were "unconvinced" and found evidence the girls had faked incidents for the benefit of reporters. Members of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry including stage magicians such as Milbourne Christopher, Joe Nickell, and Bob Couttie investigated the incidents and criticised paranormal investigators for being overly credulous, identifying various features of the case as being indicative of a hoax.

In a television interview for BBC Scotland, Janet was observed to gain attention by waving her hand, and then putting her hand in front of her mouth while a claimed "disembodied" voice was heard. During the interview both girls were asked the question "How does it feel to be haunted by a poltergeist?" Janet replied "It's not haunted" and Margaret interrupted "Shut up".

Sceptics have also noted that the alleged poltergeist voice that originated from Janet was produced by false vocal cords above the larynx and had the phraseology and vocabulary of a child. Maurice Grosse made tape recordings of Janet, and believed that there was no trickery involved, but the magician Bob Couttie has written, "he made some of the recordings available to me and, having listened to them very carefully, I came to the conclusion that there was nothing in what I had heard that was beyond the capabilities of an imaginative teenager."

So the whole haunting incident was a bit controversial and went from one side to the other a lot. So the film also played with that same theme and kept the doubt in the mind of the audience, too.

  • This and it allowed them to do some special effects with the out of focus girl. If you watched the blurry figure she appears to physically transform into the old man during that scene. – sanpaco Aug 29 '16 at 16:33
  • @sanpaco maybe you can make answer out of it – Ankit Sharma Aug 29 '16 at 16:35
  • 1
    It could also be argued that the focus was supposed to be on Ed and not Janet, so the camera wants us to focus on his reaction to have us figure out if Ed thinks what he's hearing and "seeing" is actually true or not, because that's what the church sent them there to do: verify whether the claim was true or not. We tend to create images in our mind of things that are happening that we can't see, and perhaps this was a means of achieving that effect. – MattD Aug 30 '16 at 14:44

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .