0

In the movie "The Truman Show", the show takes place in the fictional town of Seahaven. However this town is actually located in California. One would assume that the governing laws of California would also govern Seahaven, even if indirectly.

The current laws of California regard prostitution as a crime. If this is the case, wouldn't the actress Hannah Gill who is playing Meryl Burbank (Truman's wife) be guilty of prostitution as she is being paid to have sex with Truman as his "wife"? One might argue that she is legally married to Truman but I do not believe this to be the case since 1) He does not even know where he "really" lives and 2) he does he even know her "real" name. One may also argue that she is just having consensual sex but according to the film every time she sleeps with Truman she gets an extra $10,000. That clearly indicates she is getting paid to sleep with Truman. On the same token couldn't Christof (or the corporation) be charged as her pimp?

closed as off-topic by Catija, Meat Trademark, BCdotWEB, Panther, Swan Jun 16 '16 at 7:56

  • This question does not appear to be about movies or tv within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 6
    you don't have to be legally married to have sex with someone. If anything, she's a porn star, not a prostitute. – KutuluMike Jun 15 '16 at 15:13
  • 3
    I agree, it would be more related to pornography than prostitution. – DustinDavis Jun 15 '16 at 15:21
  • 9
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this is specifically asking about the application of laws to a movie character. This is probably better suited to a site for law specialists rather than film specialists. – Catija Jun 15 '16 at 15:33
  • 5
    I do not understand why Catija is voting to close my question because it has nothing to do with consulting law specialists. I'm just asking a fun question looking for an answer that would seem to fit. I did not even consider "she could be more like a porn star then a prostitute" and am only looking for a reasonable explanation in a fictional universe. Thanks. – Mykewlname Jun 15 '16 at 20:55
  • 2
    Your question literally says "under the laws of California". We are not lawyers. We do not know what those laws are or whether there is any cause for a suit. – Catija Jun 15 '16 at 23:01
6

I don't think so, since pornography is legal. The way I understand it, prostitution is illegal in California but paying people to have sex on camera is perfectly legal.

4

The way that would have worked, if at all, and leaving aside Truman not knowing about the show, was as Actors and contracts. Let's say an actor decides to do a film. Contract states that actor must indulge in sexual scenes for the show, and if they do, they get an incentive/bonus for their 'performance'. This is legal, since it's still acting, consensual, and not prostitution since this is a pre-planned activity as part of a film (as opposed to two people indulging in sex with money involved).

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .