(Spoiler alert for anybody who's even more behind in the show than I am.)
So I recently watched the first season of The Flash, and during the season finale...
...the Reverse-Flash reveals that he has a way to send Barry back in time so that he can try to save his mother from being killed. Barry & his team decide to make a deal with the Reverse-Flash and take him up on his offer. But they already know that some future event in which Barry goes back in time - to just about the point in time that they're planning to send him to - will be the very event that contributes to the death of Barry's mother. Cisco even assumes that there will be "three Barrys" when Barry goes back in time - little kid Barry from the past, time-travelling Barry from the future, and "current" time-travelling Barry from the present. But, given that the time-travel incident that precipitated the murder of Barry's mum hadn't happened yet at the point when everybody was debating whether to take the Reverse-Flash up on his offer...
...how did everybody know that this wasn't the very event that would precipitate the murder? How did the possibility of this being "that event" not even come up when everybody was debating whether or not to do it?