The two parallel arches in the Godfather trilogy follow the stories of Vito and Michael Corleone, the main motivation for both of them being to protect their family.

Vito succeeds, while his son, Michael can see the family gradually being undone.

What exactly did he do "wrong"?

He is smarter than most (maybe all) other characters in the movie, has an accurate sense of what other people might be plotting, and has a deep understanding of how everything works. From all the sons of Vito Corleone, he was by far the most competent. Sonny was too hot-headed, Fredo was too much of a coward. Is there a canonical answer why he fails?

I would guess that either

  • the times and the system are changing, leading inevitably to the fall of the traditional Prohibition-style "business",
  • or that he was doing "too well", so the competing families saw his family as a great threat to the balance and so they invested a lot of combined effort to destroy him

going so far as to manage to turn his own brother, Fredo, into a traitor

Is there a canonical (or at least very highly suggested) answer to this question? I understand that this (trying to protect the family and failing) is a major topic in the movie, but is it addressed why he manages it much worse than his father did, despite not making any obvious mistakes?

  • 1
    "Vito succeeds" But the events of the first movie pretty much happen on Vito's watch, and aren't very beneficial for the family. Didn't Michael actually save the family there?
    – Walt
    Apr 18, 2016 at 20:58
  • 1
    @Walt : Vito is close to retiring in the first movie (and does so fairly early in the movie). However, his successes from before the first movie starts, are evident. (and also accentuated in the second movie)
    – vsz
    Apr 18, 2016 at 21:02
  • @walt: i agree 100% -- i hardly see being shot and nearly killed, having my son murdered, having my war hero son becoming a murderer (although justified) success. it's a lousy business no one who has a choice gets into. Most mafiosi come from bad backgrounds, were grade school dropouts.
    – releseabe
    Jun 16, 2020 at 14:08
  • 1
    @releseabe : from the beginning of the first movie it's obvious that he was doing very well for the past several decades. It's only the events in that movie which start a downwards spiral for him and his family.
    – vsz
    Jun 16, 2020 at 18:32

2 Answers 2


There are two themes in the Godfather movies, Respect and Nobility.

When Vito comes to America, his rise to Don is seen as noble, he is providing for this family. When he becomes Don it is respect, he does things for people and they do things for him. At Connie's wedding we see them lining up with genuine respect and nervousness.

The Corlenone family is also respectful, they have peace between the five families, no narcotics (and no mention of the sex trade), mainly booze and gambling, things that at that time were more acceptable.

The trouble only erupts when Vito's moral stance prevents a move into the grey area, and Sonny's stance makes the other families move to get someone more sympathetic to their less noble ideas.

Michael has (despite his war record and unwillingness to get involved) none of this nobility. He breaks the sanctity of the family meetings as an assassin, and once Don his first act is ignoble as he tries to remove the competition in one go.

He has also has none of the respect Vito had, his own brother betrays him, the political allies allow him to be dragged to hearings, his moves to legitimise his businesses are betrayed.

Once he tries to move completely out of the crime world, he has no respect from the church (despite massive donations) and just becomes a target for an even worse version of him.

So it's not surprising he fails, where Vito was noble, Michael is ruthless, where Vito has respect, Michael has fear, and his world crumbles due to it.

  • 2
    I would say that Michael had to be as ruthless as he was in order to protect his family - if he hadn't killed Sollozzo they would have kept making attempts on Vito's life, if Fredo had been allowed to live who knows what could have happened. He was a soldier that did what was necessary to protect his family, the tragedy was that it wasn't enough to save them in the end - and they didn't even know he did his evil to protect them - look how shocked they are at the end of Godfather 3 when Mary dies, that he is actually upset. It was a tragedy in the classic Greek sense.
    – Andrew
    Dec 27, 2017 at 5:08

You really can't compare Vito and Michael's tenures. First of all, Vito's rise to power was pretty quick; he took out one guy who apparently had no connections or backup. Michael, on the other hand, grew up in a time of family power, each of which had plenty of "foot soldiers" who could enforce a family's will. In Michael's time, Vito would have been hunted down and his whole family killed, most likely while Vito watched, and then Vito would have been dealt with.

Secondly, corruption was much more widespread in Vito's time -- or at least it was more out in the open. This means that Vito had control from every level once he was established, whereas Michael was dealing with the tail end of Organized Crime as Vito knew it. Two very different eras.

Lastly, Godfather III is a rather detailed story. There is so much backstabbing, bickering, dealing, double-dealing and deception going on, it's no wonder Michael loses everything.

  • You've got Michael trying to legitimize,
  • you've got Zaza trying to illegitimize,
  • you've got Michael trying to make a deal with the Catholic church,
  • The other families want in on the deal,
  • Zaza plots to kill Michael,
  • etc...

And it all comes crashing down when the Pope gets poisoned and the church renegs on the deal. It's a mountain of problems that I don't even think Vito could have successfully unwound. And even in all this, the only physical casualty is Mary.

I'll close with this: one other huge factor was that Vito protected his family. His wife never asked questions, and (as an Italian I can attest) back in those days divorce wasn't an option. Family was everything. Michael's divorce split his family, and in the end he had nothing. He died alone.

  • 1
    I don't really understand your first paragraph. Vito had to do a lot of things off-screen between the flashbacks of the second movie and the beginning of the first movie. This is actually the success I was talking about: he built up the whole thing. The family of power with all the soldiers, was actually built by Vito while having to compete with other families. There are lots of things inferred to have happened in the last few decades before the first movie starts.
    – vsz
    Apr 18, 2016 at 22:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .