8

What would happen if shows like South Park would remove their introductory disclaimer like message like 'all celebrities are impersonated...poorly'etc. before the show stars. What could happen to them legally? Would they be allowed to and how bad would it be?

12

That disclaimer -- at least the real version you usually see at the end of movies -- is called the all persons fictitious disclaimer. (The one that South Park uses is slightly different, see below.)

The purpose of such a disclaimer is to attempt to minimize the possibility of a libel suit, if someone believed that the show was using their name, likeness, or personal life as part of the show, without their permission. The benefits of the disclaimer are twofold:

  1. It asserts that, as far as the production company is aware, everything that happened in the movie was fictional, and was created out of the imagination of the writers, directors, etc. This helps them protect their copyright claims on parts of the story that would otherwise be ineligible for copyright -- such as real-life events.
  2. It informs the audience that anything they saw in the movie that resembled a real person was unintentional. This is intended to help eliminate anyone being able to claim that the movie damaged their reputation (one of the requirements for a libel suit) by insisting that no one who saw the movie would have believed it to be about the real person.

In practice, the lack of disclaimer, by itself, isn't likely to cause problems for a movie, if the movie wasn't doing anything libelous in the first place. Similarly, if a movie really is using a real person's name/likeness/etc, having the disclaimer isn't going to magically make it OK. However, by making the claim that any such resemblance is unintentional, it shifts the burden on the victim to prove that the studio did something wrong on purpose, and that it had real consequences for them.

In the case of South Park, the disclaimer is just part of the joke. Instead of denying that they are mocking any real people, they're openly stating that they are impersonating actual celebrities. But since South Park is satire, and celebrities are famous, they can get away with doing so without too much legal trouble. (There have been cases where certain celebrities felt they stepped over the line and tried to sue but I don't think anyone has succeeded.) They could remove the disclaimer any time they want, and indeed not all episodes (or the movie) included it, and it wouldn't have much legal impact either way.

  • 4
    Yes... It's important to note that, in the US at least, satire and parody are considered protected speech... so you don't need permission from the owner of the product, name, likeness, etc... to make fun of it. – Catija Mar 11 '16 at 0:16
  • Indeed, I was sure that the disclaimer itself is a joke. Now I would miss something if they remove it. – Silver Bebs Jan 25 '17 at 15:13
  • @Catija Wouldn't the actor who was impersonated be able to file a legal suit for "lost wages"? If the impersonation was "spot on" and the production company wasn't doing a spoof style thing, just using an indistinguishable voice. – elbrant Dec 13 '18 at 23:00
  • If the production company wasn't making a spoof, and was using an impersonator and literally claiming it was the original actor, that's a very different story. That's not satire/parody, and probaby does (possibly depending on the state or country the production is running in) fall afoul of some civil laws around name or likeness. – KutuluMike Dec 13 '18 at 23:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .