Now that I am rewatching the whole series, I don't recall that I ever fully understood what Cedric Daniels in "The Wire" did while working in the Eastern District.

What was in the file that Deputy Burrel put on the table in E12S01?

enter image description here

5 Answers 5


From the script:

Burrell: You want to talk about dirt? Have at it. Talk some shit about your Eastern district days. Talk about what was going on back when you was running wild in the DEU.
Daniels: That's just talk.
Burrell: Just talk? FBI field reports. You came into a lot of money, quick....
Daniels: You wanna put my shit in the street? Feel free. But the Eastern had a lot of stories. Mine ain't the only one. A lot of people came through that district.

Daniels worked the Drug Enforcement Unit in the Eastern District, and like most of the characters on the Wire, he's done some dirty stuff himself. In his case, as drug money is an easy target and hard to trace, it was likely that he confiscated some of it himself, enough to afford a fairly lavish lifestyle for a police lieutenant.

In episode 1, we meet McNulty's FBI contact, who tells him that Daniels is dirty.

McNulty: You know Daniels? Narcotics?
Fitzhugh: What about him?
McNulty: He's running this detail.
Fitzhugh: Watch your ass then.
McNulty: He a snake?
Fitzhugh: No, he ain't that. But he's a company man. You know, a prospect...

McNulty's FBI contact also tells him him that

Daniels had several hundred thousand dollars of questionable liquid assets; it is later implied that these were picked up during Daniels' tenure in the poorly-supervised Eastern district.- Wikipedia

Apparently this had been uncovered by the FBI, who handed the evidence to Burrell, who chose to bury it.

He also warns McNulty that his commander Cedric Daniels was investigated for corruption by the FBI and they had found an excess of liquid assets. After they handed the case over to Deputy Commissioner Ervin Burrell, nothing further came of it. - Wikipedia

  • 1
    That first quote from Fitzhugh doesn't imply that he's dirty; quite the opposite.
    – jonrsharpe
    Aug 22, 2015 at 7:14
  • I disagree. A snake turns on you. Daniels won't harm him, but he's looking out for himself, because he's a climber, a guy with ambitions who plays it the way that's best for him. In fact, that's the implication when he's first given this case: that he'll make it go away. He surprises Burrell by not making it go away, hence the threat. Aug 22, 2015 at 12:15
  • 4
    "a company man... a prospect" - that doesn't say dirty cop to me at all, more someone playing the game by the rules.
    – jonrsharpe
    Aug 22, 2015 at 12:17
  • 2
    The first quote is from Bunk, not fitzhugh. Bunk didn't know about Daniels dirty money (not sure they even had a scene together)
    – Ne Mo
    Mar 3, 2017 at 10:00

Season 5 Episode 4;

Burrell talking to Nerese about Daniels when Burrell realises his job is under threat by getting replaced by Daniels:

Burrell: He's not the spick and span boy they think he is. He came up in the Eastern District, part of a bad drug unit skimming seized drug money. I actually had the Feds...
Nerese: [interrupts] This isn't about Daniels...

Edit: Just wanted to add that in one of the earlier seasons and episodes, Carver and Herc were 'caught' taking drug money for themselves when the recording off the wire didn't match the amount seized (the bin bag of cash ripped in the trunk of the car leaving a wad of cash behind). Daniels picked on the discrepancy and came down hard on Carver and Herc. With the Burrell information above in mind, it sounds like this is the kind of thing Daniels was involved in or associated with and wanted to prevent Carver and Herc from dirtying themselves and ruining their careers and maybe further dirtying Daniels.


It's a storytelling technique to leave questions opened and details blurred. Sometimes it's just an story opener like rosebud in Citizen Kane or the briefcase in Pulp Fiction and sometimes it's a fuzzy detail of the background story of a character like the relationship of Walter White and Gretchen Schwartz in Breaking Bad or if Mr. Pink in Reservoir Dogs could escape.

This storytelling technique leaves space to think, to talk about, to decide and to add missing pieces by your own.

So, in my opinion it's unanswered intentionally what Daniels has done or not done during his eastern district days. It could be just defamation. The recipient has to decide.

So, what do you think?

  • @JimG. Sorry, I already read the answer more than once and for me there is still no evidence. Or do you think because some FBI Investigation found some excess on liquid assets he must be guilty? Nov 16, 2016 at 19:06

Given that all of this information comes to us in the first season, I look to the subject matter. All the corruption and dirty money exchanges between politicians and drug dealers. It makes sense that working his way up the chain, Daniels came onto a bunch of drugs that were tied, in some way, to a politicians name. He was told he could bury himself if he pursued the evidence, or take some money and leave it alone. It would also explain why when they picked up day-day he was very earnest about just letting him take his money and leave.

He was straddling the fence between doing whats right and trying to work his way up without ruffling too many feathers. I think his past actions are what made him seem so much like a flippy floppy character in season one.


I agree that it is open to interpretation as to what type of dirt they have on him but it's obvious he has way more money than he should and when Daniels was speaking with his wife and she asked him what they had on him he just sighed and didn't say that they had nothing on him rather they just cut to a different scene and let you wonder. It is reasonable to hypothesize given the information that they told us about it that Daniels was dirty in some way shape or form when he worked at the Eastern district. As the user above States, he most likely stole money that they seized. That's why he didn't want herc or Carver to do the same thing because he felt guilty about it and perhaps looks at things differently now.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .