Why do film studios not release certain old movies? For example, a few of Monroe and Hepburns's work isn't released on DVD. Why?

  • There are likely many factors: Ownership of studios change over time and it's not clear who owns the rights to what. Public interest; if executives determine that they wont make a big enough profit from re-releasing movies in new formats, then they wont do it.
    – onewho
    Commented Jul 27, 2015 at 18:28
  • If it's owned by Turner, it may be part of their Vault Collection series. They took some old movies that weren't huge earners and released them in limited quantities through their online store only. This reduces the costs of a huge run and allows collectors to get ahold of movies they want. Commented Jul 27, 2015 at 19:21

1 Answer 1


The answer is most likely one of two possibilities:

  1. They don't feel that the investment of preparing and producing the DVD will be justified by its sales
  2. The copyright of various elements of the movie is ambiguous or widely distributed, and resolving that situation legally is cost prohibitive, if it's even completely possible

For the first one, regardless of what it costs to produce the DVD, if they project that only a few hundred or a few thousand people will ever buy it, they may not feel too rushed to get the job done for what amounts to a few thousand bucks to the bottom line. Doesn't mean it will never happen, but that no one has strong incentive to make it happen.

For the second, copyright can be a complicated beast, and any number of people involved in the original project could own copyright interest in the final product (depending on how the contracts were set up originally). That is further complicated by people who have sold their interest or who have died and left it to potentially numerous beneficiaries, the details of which are difficult and expensive and, potentially, intractable to work out. This matters because a work is licensed to be released only in certain media, when a new medium arrives (such as DVD), it needs to be re-licensed for the new medium. If a particular movie suffers from this problem, it's unlikely to ever be released in its original form, what they'll do is identify the portions of the work for which they can't identify or secure the appropriate rights, and somehow remove or replace them. You'll see this most often in TV shows that were current prior to the advent of DVD, where the popular music played as a soundtrack couldn't be licensed, or not at a reasonable cost, and so is replaced by a royalty-free soundtrack instead.

If I had to guess for the particular situation you bring up, the first situation is probably the primary influence behind whether it happens or not.

  • 1
    A well thought out answer (I came to same conclusion myself), but I would look for evidence to back up your claim.
    – onewho
    Commented Jul 27, 2015 at 18:30
  • Also sometimes the studio decides that public taste and what fits with the corporate image has changed over time, Disney for example will probably not release "A song of the South" on DVD for the US market. Just too difficult from a PR perspective.
    – Dan Mills
    Commented Oct 3, 2017 at 14:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .