In a film or TV series there are often people playing police officers, quite often on set where members of the public can see them.

Wouldn't this fall foul of the 'impersonating a police officer' law? If you can legally pretend to be a police officer on film what would stop me filming a friend with a hidden camera as he pretends to be a policeman in a improvised film? Or pretending to be a policeman whilst under a CCTV camera and claim I intended to buy the film later as part of a movie project?

Is there a licence they would need to buy?

Is it something to do with being a recognized film studio?

Or is it arguably illegal but the police are rational enough to not bother with it?

  • A lot of movies are made in California, so the California Penal Code Section 538d might be relevant here. It heavily features the word 'fraudulent', which I suspect does not apply to an actor wearing a police uniform (unless she wears it after work to try and get off speeding fines). Aug 8, 2014 at 15:43
  • Could the dive bomber leave a note to let me know how I might improve the question?
    – Stefan
    Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01

2 Answers 2


When filming on location for a major production, as in out in public, you usually have to obtain permits to film wherever you're about to film. Roads and streets may be closed down. You usually also need to notify the local police of your actions so they know what's going on. The production company may also hire security to keep people away from the set or area they're filming. When an area is closed off for filming, this is referred to as a closed set, meaning no one who's not supposed to be there is allowed to be there.

The city of New York, for example, will actually provide free police assistance to help out, likely for things like guiding traffic and general security of an area being used for filming. They also state that filming with a hand held camcorder (like what you'd buy at any consumer electronics store) or tripod setup will usually not require you to have a permit. Further, they state that the production company must allow any residents or citizens that work in the area access to places they're supposed to be. They even dictate that if production lighting is pouring through someone's window, they need to provide blackout masking for the window so they don't disturb the resident.

However, if you and a friend simply went around with a hidden cam and were acting like police officers without the backing of the city and local police force for the area in which you're filming, you'd almost certainly run afoul of the law. Remember: ignorance of the law does not mean you can't get in trouble for breaking the law.

Generally, if you're going to be filming something that involves actors who look like emergency service personnel, contact the police for the local area and get the lowdown on what you need to do in order to film. Major cities like New York have entire departments dedicated to helping production studios or even small indie projects film within the city, and can also guide you on how to properly handle yourselves to avoid trouble with the law. These laws can be different for each city as well, so what one city allows may not be allowed in another.

  • Most cities require an actual police officer on site (at your expense) if you are depicting emergency responders on film.
    – yelxe
    Aug 8, 2014 at 21:25

A 'real' movie, with a normal crew is a large enterprise -- hard to miss. Thus, actors in police uniform in front of a lens, with make up and hair all over them, 50 crew guys & women, equipment everywhere, trucks and picture vehicles, cable, lights and barricades, it's hard to argue the public could be reasonably deceived by an actor in uniform. Actors act, read the jokes, eat the donuts, ask the director if 'it was good enough', etc. In some years, I've never seen an actor leave his life's desire (for the most part) to go around the corner, off set, to hassle anyone for anything. It seems very unlikely, based on observation and experience. It seems as improbable as a Judge taking off his robes for a short dance in front of the jury, a stripper stopping to do a soliloquy, a Sports Illustrated swimsuit model entering a competitive hot dog eating contest.

Without deception or intent, without a reasonable chance at the public being fooled, it's unlikely this would happen, anyone would find cause to bring suit, any lawyer would dare bring it before a Court.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .