In the movie "The Dark Knight", what did the joker really want to prove? I mean burning all the money, killing few innocent people and creating chaos.

3 Answers 3


Some obvious, important quotes:

  • Introduce a little anarchy. Upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos. I'm an agent of chaos. Oh, and you know the thing about chaos? It's fair!

  • Don't talk like one of them, you're not! Even if you'd like to be. To them, you're just a freak, like me. They need you right now. But when they don't, they'll cast you out, like a leper. See, their morals, their code... it's a bad joke. Dropped at the first sign of trouble. They're only as good as the world allows them to be. I'll show you, when the chips are down, these... these civilized people? They'll eat each other. See, I'm not a monster, I'm just ahead of the curve.

So, as Ionstar mentioned: the Joker wants chaos.

However, I don't agree that "he wanted to validate himself by dragging or proving everyone could be dragged down to his level". He needs no validations.

There is a quote which I think is more important than the two above:

Batman: Then why do you want to kill me?

The Joker: [giggling] Kill you?! I don't wanna to kill you! What would I do without you? Go back to ripping off mob dealers? No, no, NO! No. You... you... complete me.

Don't forget that the Joker is mad (at least when viewed form the perspective of us, civilized people). He wants to play with the Batman, probably because he sees him as the only worthy opponent (don't forget that the Joker effortlessly rips off whole mob of Gotham!).

Finally, the Joker believes that the he and the Batman are destined to do this forever (as they really do in the comic books). That's why he never kills the Batman (and it's not like he never had the chance): You won't kill me out of some misplaced sense of self-righteousness. And I won't kill you because you're just too much fun.

To conclude: it's just a challenge and good fun for him.

  • 1
    Agreed about Batman specifically, but I think the Joker did want to drag as many people down to his level as possible, to validate that the basic state of the world is chaos. It's why he had the robbers turning on each other, why he made Batman choose between saving Harvey or Maggie Gyllenhall's character, why he threatened to (and did) blow up a hospital (so people would do his work for him), why he set up the boat standoff, why he visited Harvey Dent and so carefully explained his motives. Batman also seemed to feel this way, as he said something similar when he confronted the Joker.
    – lonstar
    Jan 4, 2014 at 22:43
  • 1
    @Ionstar The Joker does indeed thrive off chaos I agree but I think its the fact that Batman being a challenge to his psychotic intelligence is too much of a good opportunity to pass up on challenging the Batman, as he admits before he simply ripped off mob dealers before Batman showed up and afterwards his desire to cause chaos escalated as a direct response to something he considered to be more of a challenge. Apr 3, 2015 at 21:08

The Joker was a disciple of chaos, and wanted to prove that anyone - especially Batman, disciple of law - were as ready to abandon law and morality as he had already done.

  1. He had the robbers progressively executing each other in the opening scene.
  2. He forced Batman to choose between Harvey Dent and his girlfriend.
  3. He went to Harvey in the hospital room and turned his anger from what the Joker had done to the arbitrariness of life, turning Harvey into Two-Face.
  4. He threatened to blow up the hospital unless someone murdered the man who knew Batman's true identity.
  5. He set up the boat bombs, to set people at each other's throats.

Basically, he wanted to validate himself by dragging or proving everyone could be dragged down to his level, and was pretty successful at it (even Batman, using the cell phone monitoring technology from Lucius). Even at the end, the Joker encouraged Batman to indulge his rage and drop him from the roof.

Or, as Alfred said, some people just want to watch the world burn.


What did the Joker want to prove? The long answer:

“You only have power over people as long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything, he's no longer in your power--he's free again.” ― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

When people are attached to things (e.g. Batman to Rachel (and his rules), Harvey Dent to fairness, the mob to $$ and power), you have power over them with that thing. They can be held hostage. The Joker has no rules and nothing he's attached to, so he can't be held hostage for anything. He's free.

If he's trying to "prove" anything, it's to show how stuck people are based on the beliefs/attachments that they think will keep them safe and happy. He will prove them wrong every time. Even though he looks evil, he's helping people to become more free by taking everything away from them. (Another example of this is the imprisonment of Evie in "V for Vendetta").

"You can't take it with you." It's part of the Hero's Journey.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .