According to Wikipedia, the movie Airplane! is called Flying High! in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Japan, and the Philippines. At the same time, Netflix in Australia calls this movie Airplane! and not Flying High!.

I have looked online for some reasonable explanations as to why this is so, but nothing seems like a reasonable explanation. One explanation is that the word "airplane" is actually "aeroplane" in some of those countries. However, this doesn't explain why it isn't called Flying High! in Britain. Another explanation is that before the movie was officially released, it was tested for audiences under the name Flying High! in those countries. Apparently, it stuck.

Does anyone know if either of those explanations is correct? Or is there another reason?

  • I wonder if it has to do with the zero tolerance policies regarding drugs in the US...perhaps it was called "Flying High" originally, but the name was changed for the American audience?
    – user8600
    Commented Mar 17, 2014 at 9:53
  • 10
    Gotta love the German title: "Die unglaubliche Reise in einem verrückten Flugzeug"
    – BCdotWEB
    Commented Nov 18, 2014 at 12:24
  • 1
    @BCdotWEB: which Google Translate says is The incredible journey in a crazy airplane. Quite apt!
    – wallyk
    Commented Aug 27, 2015 at 22:54
  • 4
    I always thought that the title was a joke on the sheer stupidity of thinking an aeroplane was an 'air plane'. Kind of like dumb and dumber to, or tropic thunder. As such it was quite a funny title. It was only years later I discovered Americans actually spell it airplane. So the title isn't a joke at all, and quite dull.
    – user29341
    Commented Dec 31, 2015 at 9:57
  • 2
    @Tom and where do planes fly normally?
    – Mari-Lou A
    Commented Dec 31, 2015 at 12:57

4 Answers 4


I suspect the primary reason that Airplane! (1980) has so many aliases is because other countries did not have a series of popular disaster movies like Airport (1970), The Poseidon Adventure (1972), Earthquake (1974), Towering Inferno (1974), Heat Wave! (1974), Airport 75, Jaws (1975), The Deep (1977), The Concorde... Airport 79, Plague (1979), etc. to provide the same context to the title we have.

Even if the non-domestic audiences knew the Hollywood movies by the U.S. title, those audiences did not experience the onslaught of "me too" television disaster movies inspired by the 1970s movies. See IMDB's list of 1970s disaster movies here. Notice the great number of U.S. television movies made in response to the movies.

It is rare to talk to a Brit who doesn't "correct" me when I say "airplane". No doubt that nuisance distraction is at least of part why some English speaking countries avoid the word completely. Flying High! is a much more apt title if one doesn't know the context of U.S. disaster movie titles, and is a nice double entendre with being high off the ground and stoned—or just being disastrously crazy.

  • 4
    In Norway the title was "Hjelp Vi Flyr" ("Help We're Flying"). But I agree it's due to the not immediate recognition and comparison to the disaster-movie "Airport". In Norway this was called "Storflyplassen" - a literal translation, but still sort of lacking the "omph" of "Airport". Besides I don't think us Norwegian ever got that carried away with disaster-movies. Commented Aug 27, 2015 at 22:36
  • 2
    In Italy (even nowadays) most of the foreign movie titles are translated, even when not necessary and, unfortunately not seldom, in a "bizarre way" (see italian "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" adaptation - thefw.com/foreign-movie-translations). The italian title for "Airplane!" was "L'aereo più pazzo del mondo" which translated in english would sound like "The world's craziest airplane". Want to know the sequel's title? Easy peasy ... "L'aereo più pazzo del mondo ... sempre più pazzo", which would (astonishingly) be "The world's craziest airplane ... ever more crazy".
    – Pesetas74
    Commented Dec 9, 2015 at 10:14
  • 2
    Not sure what the "Brit" comment adds - it was titled "Airplane!" over here too.
    – OrangeDog
    Commented Jun 24, 2016 at 12:33
  • 1
    @OrangeDog I'm assuming it's reference to the fact that the British spelling is Aeroplane, but you're right, it was Airplane! here.
    – SGR
    Commented Mar 9, 2017 at 12:14

According to this (admittedly unattributed) post, Lesley Nielsen confirmed in an interview that the film was retitled "Flying High" in order to avoid any potential clash with the Australian film "Airport '80" (itself originally titled Airport '79: The Concorde) which had been re-released in the same cycle and would therefore have been showing at the same cinemas.

                                          enter image description here

As to why the entire Oceanian market had this change, I suspect that's more to do with the way that publicity materials are printed. Notably all the countries where it was changed (Phillipines, Indonesia, Japan) received posters in English, despite English not being the prevalent langauge whereas larger markets like Germany had fully customised posters and production materials in their own language.


As all the mentioned disaster movies had been shown in Australia (I should know, I saw them all), I doubt that "lack of context" is the reason.

I would suggest that in many of the countries, Australia & New Zealand in particular, the concept of "getting high" was less taboo than in the US & the title "Flying High" has a much more humorous double entendre connotation than the rather naff "Airplane".

  • 1
    The movie's working title was "Kentucky Fried Airplane" -- a previous movie from the same makers was called "The Kentucky Fried Movie".
    – BCdotWEB
    Commented Nov 18, 2014 at 12:28

The only explanation I can think of is there was a tv series in the US on CBS in 1978-1979 titled "Flying High". Maybe the producers didn't want to confuse audiences with a similar title, but used this outside the US.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .