In the movie Fargo, automobile sales manager Jerry Lundegard owes $320,000 to GMAC, due to loans he has made for fictitious vehicles. At the same time, he arranges for his wife to be kidnapped for $80,000, with the kidnappers getting half of that ransom and the other half going to Jerry.

Why did Jerry ask for less ransom money than he owed? He could have easily asked for more -- he knows his father-in-law can afford it -- and gotten himself out of his mess with GMAC. (Indeed, he even tries unsuccessfully to call off the kidnapping after he finds a $750,000 scheme.)

Looking for an in-universe answer. Of course, the out-of-universe answer is that it helps to show how pathetic he is.

Related, but does not address the mismatch in the numbers: Is there any hint as to why Jerry needs the money?

1 Answer 1


Part of Jerry’s scheme is to embezzle the ransom. He tells the kidnappers (Steve Buscemi and Peter Stormare’s characters) that the ransom is $80k, and they will receive a cut from it plus the tan Sierra. He tells Wade that the kidnappers have asked for $1 million.

His whole scheme is upended when Wade refuses to let Jerry be the one who hands off the ransom (“it’s my money!”) and does it himself. The funny-looking fella is surprised to see Wade, ends up killing him, and is then even more surprised to find $920k more than he’d expected in the briefcase. He buries the extra money in the snow as a way of concealing it from his partner.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .