What's the term for a sequel of a film, film series, or TV series where some of the same characters from the original are in the sequel, but they're older by 5+ years? Usually you get the same cast whenever appropriate. It could be revival, but I'm not sure.

Some examples:

  • Boy Meets World and then Girl Meets World
  • Avatar: The Last Airbender / The Legend of Aang and then Avatar: The Legend of Korra --> We didn't get the same cast, though maybe not appropriate to get the same cast
  • Rugrats (and Pre-school Daze, I guess) and then All Grown Up
  • Indiana Jones 1-3 and then Indiana Jones 4
  • Star Wars 1-6 and then Star Wars 7-9
  • Prison Break S1-4 and then Prison Break S5
  • iCarly the kids show and then iCarly the adult show.

Some non-examples:

  • Breaking Bad and then El Camino: A Breaking Bad Movie --> The latter picks up right after the former left off.
  • Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul --> The latter is a prequel.

I think Rugrats and All Grown Up is kind of an exception. This case is probably just both sequel and spin-off: sequel in the case that it continues the story, and spin-off in that it's a different kind of story, in particular a different flavour (but maybe the genre is the same, IDK). Similar with Avatar and Korra except not a different flavour.

  • 2
    Trope might be the wrong word, but asking after the terminology of a specific way to continue a story (by following (a) character(s) after a certain time span) doesn't seem vague to me.
    – Joachim
    Commented Aug 6, 2020 at 12:29
  • 2
    While I do think that "character aged with actor trope" is a good answer, I also think a lot of these are considered "revival" spin-offs and are often used to tell an ongoing "generational story". Commented Aug 7, 2020 at 20:19
  • @DarthLocke I agree the answer isn't ideal. Seems like best answer so far. In particular 'character aged with actor' doesn't quite answer Rugrats vs All Grown Up...but well given how long Rugrats was I guess they did kinda age similarly.
    – BCLC
    Commented Apr 30, 2022 at 13:02

2 Answers 2


I think what you're looking for is the Character Aged with the Actor trope.

An old franchise comes back after many years, but, of course, now the actors are all old. Instead of recasting or making the actors up to look younger (or using Digital Deaging), it's decided to acknowledge how much time has passed and just have the characters be that much older.

Using one of the OP's examples, this is especially obvious with Star Wars episodes IV-VI vs. VII-IX with respect to Luke, Leia, Han, and Lando.

  • this does account for the live ones and a bit of avatar and korra. i think the rugrats and all grown up is kind of an exception. this case is probably just both sequel and spin-off. i'll edit post to indicate these. thanks!
    – BCLC
    Commented Aug 7, 2020 at 6:01

While this may not fit each and every one of your examples, I think many of these kinds of spin-offs are often referred to as "revivals".

Unlike spin-offs, in which a television network creates an entirely new series around an existing character or setting, a revival reintroduces most or many of the original program's storylines, characters, and locales, and usually attempts to resolve story arcs that the original run failed to complete, as opposed to a sequel that may introduce a new storyline with some of the same characters after the previous series' story ended. Revivals usually take place at some point after the original series ends. By contrast, reboots and remakes may feature many of the original characters differently, but are usually played by new cast members and without taking into account events or continuity that occurred during the original series.

Case in point: Star Wars episodes 1-9 is the Skywalker "Saga" (a term coming from Norse Prose), that is an ongoing inter-generational story about the the corruption & absolution of three generations of 'Skywalkers' through the political and metaphysical aspirations of the dark sided Sith Lord, Darth Sidious. In this case you do see the continuation of certain characters and thus previous stories continue to inform and shape the next story, but yet each story also introduces new characters and plots that tend to ring around or "echo" the former story/stories.

And while chronologically speaking of the story itself, you could say that episodes 4-6 & 7-9 are both sequels and revivals, but also episodes 4-6 were actually made first and so technically episodes 1-3 are a prequel story and 7-9 a sequel revival to "the original trilogy"...

Even looking at this Wikipedia paragraph, you can see an attempt to streamline what may be a sequel/spin-off vs the specifically of a revival, which not only seeks to see many previous cast reunite at an older age, but also seeks to address things unanswered from the previous work, as opposed to making a brand new story line that doesn't relate, but doesn't really address if the genre or tone has to be the same.

However it doesn't account for something like Better Call Saul that is mostly a prequel fixating at first on only two characters from Breaking Bad, but slowly,and surely more and more characters, aesthetics, tone, and plot points that relate more directly to Breaking Bad have encroached into it's reality as the final season is walking right up to the line of the Pilot episode of Breaking Bad.

In addition the series also has flash forwards to a time period post Breaking Bad. It remains to be seen how much the future story line plays to Jimmy McGill internally vs how much the last two seasons may reform or reshape any of the narrative of Breaking Bad, but the potential is there. In this case, should it touch more directly on things from Breaking Bad, it would be very hard to technically categorize/define what Better Call Saul actually is, because it's doing a lot of things at the same time and because 'Breaking Bad' is turning into a bigger franchise. Could it be considered a prequel revival in any capacity?

Then we also have something like the upcoming Bosch: Legacy, which is at the very least a direct sequel to Bosch. In this case there is no massive time jump, as the new series was starting to be made immediately after the previous series ended, so the few returning characters are only a little bit older. It will feature at least 3 of the previous' series main/recurring characters, will still take place in many of the same locations/place, but the circumstances of these characters has shifted after the events of Bosch season seven. It also will eventually be incorporating other Michael Connolly works that feature other characters that "cross over" in the author's ongoing crime novel series' universe, such as Renee Ballard.

So again, trying to categorize this might be hard, because clearly the title (ie:"Legacy") is in part referring to a generational passing of the baton, but also potentially what the main older character will leave behind, but it could also be referring to what the main character may still not know about his family history, and thus could still relate to earlier narratives from Bosch. But without a big time jump and no more than three established characters, and considering it takes place in the same location, keeping the same tone/genre, can this be considered a revival too?

Some works may be very complicated to discern because of structure of the story/stories themselves, the order in which an ongoing story/series of related stories are made (because the perspective of "order of ideas" could subjectively change how one looks at it), and/or if genre switching can effect the definition of a revival specifically, despite meeting other criteria.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .