2

In Downton Abbey, they are constantly mentioning going "up to London." However, this is supposed to be set in Yorkshire, which is WAY north of London already. So, why don't they say they are going "down to London"?

2
  • It's just an expression meaning that London is, perhaps, more Important than the countryside. – Paulie_D Oct 25 '19 at 17:23
  • 4
    This seems like a better question for the English Language Usage site. In fact, it's already been asked and answered: english.stackexchange.com/questions/23545/… – Juhasz Oct 25 '19 at 19:51
7

This is down to the normal English usage that you always go "up" to the capital.

It has always been the convention on the railways that all trains heading towards London are "up" trains, those heading away are "down" trains. This usage is common to all transport.

Up and Down are not related to points of the compass, but have always been related to the relative status of your destination. It has always been the case that you go "up" to a destination with at higher perceived status than your current location. For example, students always go "up" to university and come "down" from it during the holidays.

4
  • The use of "always" is a bit too strong here, at least in American English. I often take the train "down" to the city from my town, simply because it's located to the south. This is not as absolute a rule as you make it out to be. – Nuclear Hoagie Oct 25 '19 at 17:28
  • I note that "Up" and "Down" might mean the equivalent of north and south due to the usual orientation of maps according to Zoe, or might mean high status places and low status places according to Chemunka, but they can also mean higher and lower in altitude. Upper Egypt is in the south, up river, higher than Lower Egypt in the north closer to sea level. And of course residents of DOWNton Abbey might think it is "down" compared to other places like London. – M. A. Golding Oct 25 '19 at 18:04
  • 1
    Being an English native myself, I often go "down to London". – OrangeDog Oct 25 '19 at 18:39
  • This might relate to how old you are @OrangeDog .... as the other answer says, this is a little archaic and perhaps falling out of use. It certainly used to be the convention. – iandotkelly Oct 26 '19 at 4:01
2

According to The Phrase Finder:

Do you say 'up to London' regardless of which way you are coming from and if so why?

This is an odd one. The widespread, if a little archaic, use of 'up' when travelling to London is based partly on the importance of the capital and partly on the habit of denoting railway lines as 'up' lines (to London) and 'down' lines (out of London).

Google NGrams shows that "up to London" was many times more popular than "down to London" in the 19-20th century, the time period when Downton Abbey is set (although since then the gap has closed a lot).

1
  • Great use of ngrams to highlight the convention used to be much stronger than it is today. – iandotkelly Oct 26 '19 at 4:02
1

Cheenmunka has it mostly right. You always go "up" to the major city, and "down" to the lesser city.

This convention is actually from the railway.

In British practice, railway directions are usually described as "up" and "down", with "up" being towards a major location. This convention is applied not only to the trains and the tracks, but also to items of lineside equipment and to areas near a track. Since British trains run on the left, the "up" side of a line is on the left when proceeding in the "up" direction.

Today, rails don't run like this, and therefore it has been dropped out of popular speech (hence all the comments on Cheenmuka's post), but back in the time when Downtown was set, it would certainly be more widely accepted.

Indeed, googling "site:uk __.to.London" gives about equal results for "up" and "down", but Bartleby shows numerous results in older texts for "up" and none at all for "down". Source: ask.metafilter

This has been carried elsewhere in the world. For example India

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .