The clip below of the Battle of Wits scene from The Princess Bride (IMDB), the character Vizzini (Wallace Shawn) says:

You’ve fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous is never get involved in a land war in Asia, but only slightly less well known is this; never go in against a Sicilian, when death is on the line! Aha ha ha ha… (and then keels over, dead.)

What does the line "never get involved in a land war in Asia" refer to? I don't understand the reference. Does it connect to the plot in some way I'm missing, or is it completely unrelated?

  • 5
    Why should you never fight a land war in Asia?
    – user18935
    Sep 28, 2019 at 3:10
  • 1
    @Jeeped Yes, I'm definitely not planning on doing this, but does the reference have anything to do with the movie's plot, or is it an unrelated reference?
    – uhoh
    Sep 28, 2019 at 3:17
  • 3
    Vizzini is exercising hubris during a 'battle of wits' with the other guy. His megalomania demands that he show his superiority by performing the typical villain monologue. This involves labeling the other guy's actions as a classic blunder. He goes on to describe two other classic blunders. The first is the one mentioned above. The second is 'never go in against a Sicilian, when death is on the line!' Since he falls dead from the poison after saying this, he is proven wrong and the other guy is the better of the two despite Vizzini's high opinion of his former self.
    – user18935
    Sep 28, 2019 at 3:24
  • 1
    The quote is also mentioned in this WWII documentary (at 32m 12s) referring to Germany invading Russia
    – stevec
    Nov 10, 2021 at 23:11
  • 1
    The documentary doesn't mention the Prices Bride. The full quote from the documentary is "There are two military aphorisms that every soldier knows and that Hitler ignored at his peril. The first is that no plan survives contact with the enemy, and the second: never fight a land war in Asia, unless you're heading west. Hitler ignores both of them, and that will prove to be a big mistake".
    – stevec
    Nov 10, 2021 at 23:20

4 Answers 4


"Never fight a land war in Asia" is one of those weird aphorisms that is widely known, but on which nobody agrees who originally said it. It has variously been attributed to Bernard Montgomery (British General), Dwight Eisenhower (American General and later President), and Douglas MacArthur (American General).

The line was in the original book by William Goldman which was published in 1973. At the time, the US was trying to extricate itself from the Vietnam War. Many Americans thought the war a terrible mistake, and "Never fight a land war in Asia" was a frequently heard "obvious truth". A significant fraction of the viewers of the 1987 film would have clear memories of that period of American history.

As @ToddWilcox notes in a comment, the line worked as humor (at least back then) because it brazenly breaks the fourth wall and inserts a highly topical meme from the "real world" into a fairy story where it makes no sense: there is no indication of Asia even existing in the world of The Princess Bride.

As the origins of the quote lapse into obscurity, the humor of it may begin to fail.


Getting involved in a land war in Asia is a classic blunder in the real world. Examples from before The Princess Bride include:

  • The Korean War
  • The Vietnam War
  • The Russian War in Afghanistan

All three were land wars in Asia that have been seen as mistakes. Grave mistakes. Epic blunders. Arguably the most famous classic blunders.

You could also include multiple failed attempts to invade Russia from Europe, the most famous of those being Napoleon’s march into Russia that basically destroyed his once powerful army. Very famous blunder.

  • 1
    Thanks, any thoughts on "Does it connect to the plot in some way I'm missing, or is it completely unrelated?"
    – uhoh
    Sep 28, 2019 at 4:42
  • 2
    Hitler made the same blunder centuries later Sep 28, 2019 at 11:41
  • 5
    @uhoh To me it’s an example of taking down the fourth wall. This land of Florin seems to be not real and not of our time, but long ago. So it doesn’t make sense for Vizzini to know about 19th and 20th century land wars in Asia. Or we could suppose that in the world of The Princess Bride, there is also an Asia and coincidentally all land wars there have been blunders. Mainly I think this line speaks to Vizzini’s character, not to the plot. He’s not only smart, he’s learned in history and politics and war. And of course it’s mainly meant as a joke for the audience. Sep 28, 2019 at 21:05
  • 8
    Also, the Grandfather is reading the story to his Grandson. It's possible that he's ad-libbing while telling the story, but they show this as the characters actually saying these things because the Grandson wouldn't get the joke, so in his mind, they actually said them. Sep 29, 2019 at 1:07
  • 2
    @Yakk Yes, and also "Stammik's Folly" of 2369.
    – Michael
    May 24, 2022 at 21:16

The other answers are correct about the general reference - there are numerous examples in real Earth history of disastrous land wars in Asia. But what the other answers seem to miss is that The Princess Bride seems to take place on what we might call "mostly Earth."

There are certainly references to things that seem not to exist on Earth: the countries of Florin and Gilder, shrieking eels, R.O.U.S.es, The Cliffs of Insanity. But there are many more examples of things that do resemble our own history and environment.

Of course, the presence of humans, horses, pigs, hippos, peanuts, and suchlike already suggest that we're on Earth. Probably even more compelling are these quotes from the film:


I could give you my word as a Spaniard....

Inigo Montoya: You are using Bonetti’s Defense against me, ah?
Man in Black: I thought it fitting considering the rocky terrain.
Inigo: Naturally, you must suspect me to attack with Capa Ferro?
Man in Black: Naturally, but I find that Thibault cancels out Capa Ferro.
Don’t you? Inigo: Unless the enemy has studied his Agrippa… which I have.

These are references to real-world Italian fencers, Rocco Bonetti, Ridolfo Capo Ferro and Camillo Agrippa, and the Dutch fencer Gérard (Girard) Thibault d’Anvers.

Let me put it this way: have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates?

Because iocane comes from Australia, as everyone knows, and Australia is entirely peopled with criminals

The real Roberts has been retired fifteen years and living like a king in Patagonia.

Now, the fact that we're on "mostly Earth," rather than Earth, suggests that the land wars in Asia needn't necessarily represent anything that happened in our real history. However, considering that Vizzini appears to know about the transport of British and Irish prisoners to Australia, which occurred between 1788 and 1868, it seems reasonable to suppose that The Princess Bride takes place sometime after Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812.

A counter argument could be made that the costumes and technology we see do not at all resemble 19th century Europe. However, this is very common even in films which are supposed to take place on actual Earth. Consider Braveheart and William Wallace's

farcical representation as a wild and hairy highlander painted with woad (1,000 years too late) running amok in a tartan kilt (500 years too early).

Freedom's Sword

  • "Colossus" is a general term for someone or something that is very big. The name "Colossus of Rhodes" comes from this term. Oct 4, 2021 at 3:51
  • 1
    @Acccumulation, I believe you've got it backwards: etymonline.com/word/colossus. In the 18th century, English writers began using the Latin word colossus as a metaphor for anything as gigantic as the Colossus of Rhodes. The Latin word was taken form the Greek kolossos, which described gigantic statues, like the one at the entrance to the harbor of Rhodes.
    – Juhasz
    Oct 4, 2021 at 16:29
  • A term for large statues is not the same as originating from a particular. And every word comes from something. Does the fact that they're speaking English show that they're on Earth? Oct 4, 2021 at 18:32
  • 1
    @Acccumulation, this does not seem worth arguing about. I'll remove that point.
    – Juhasz
    Oct 4, 2021 at 18:45
  • We might also imagine that in Morgenstern wrote something quite different in the original Florinese, and that Goldman whimsically replaced it with something that a 20th-century American would recognize. Translators do this sort of thing all the time. Oct 9, 2023 at 20:58

Vizzini is an idiot, but he is not uneducated. He has book knowledge, but not intelligence or wit, nor does he read context very well. That one quote paints this picture perfectly.

For him to know to never get involved in a land war in Asia requires him to have studied military history. This is not something an uneducated man would know.

But for him to think that this is the most important nugget of knowledge shows how out of touch he is with himself. He is not in any position to command an army, let alone in Asia. This knowledge will never benefit him. He is contextually oblivious to himself.

And this is the best case scenario for him. If he was merely regurgitating knowledge he did not study himself, or if he mentioned it just to boast about knowing such an esoteric nugget of wisdom, only paints him as an even bigger idiot and/or contextually oblivious fool.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .