2

In James Bond movies, villains sometimes used to get James Bond in custody. Instead of killing him on sight (they used to do so for any other sidekicks), why are these villains forced to enter into a lousy conversation which buys enough time for Bond to think and escape?

In Skyfall, the villain just shot a sidekick, just a moment ago, but he chose to talk to Bond and Bond escaped from his clutches just in time.

Why is that so?

  • 8
    TVTropes warning! Bond Villain Stupidity – James McLeod Jun 22 at 4:10
  • I'd say this is verging on too broad, as there are 24 different Bond films (25 if you count Never Say Never Again). Any answer I could write would end up looking like that giant TV Tropes list James linked. Sometimes the villains have legitimate reasons, and other times they're just idiots. – F1Krazy Jun 22 at 9:28
  • 1
    @F1Krazy Eh, it does come off as a bit broad but villain behavior is consistent enough to where a specific answer could be provided. Yeah, there're special cases where Bond is interrogated for information, etc., but I think the OP is specifically asking about when that's not the case; when the villain is ready to kill Bond but instead leaves him alive for too long and for no apparent reason, thus providing Bond enough time to escape. – Charles Jun 22 at 16:41
5

This doesn't always happen.

A lot of the time, the villain (or henchmen) are actively trying to kill Bond - they always fail, but the intent to kill is obvious.

The theatrical execution attempts in the Bond films are indicative of the ego of the villain in question - they're an expression of power and control. Ultimately, of course, there's not enough of either, so Bond escapes.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .