Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 9, 2019 at 14:32 history edited Ankit Sharma CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1225 characters in body
Apr 9, 2019 at 11:06 comment added Ankit Sharma movieweb.com/henry-cavill-superman-statement-warner-bros
Apr 9, 2019 at 10:58 comment added Ankit Sharma @RC0993 I dig but no interview why Cavil not there and why costume was not same as JL film. I will dig more later
Apr 9, 2019 at 10:57 vote accept RC0993
Apr 9, 2019 at 10:57 comment added RC0993 [UPVOTE] That's insightful. Although it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them I still don't buy this to be true (more like a guess). But I liked the research behind this answer. :)
Apr 9, 2019 at 10:53 comment added Ankit Sharma @RC0993 updated with more info
Apr 9, 2019 at 10:28 history edited Ankit Sharma CC BY-SA 4.0
added 739 characters in body
Apr 9, 2019 at 10:20 comment added Ankit Sharma @RC0993 it's low budget film and affording cameo maybe tough for them. And Cavil might be out of DCEU, we never know
Apr 9, 2019 at 10:19 history edited Ankit Sharma CC BY-SA 4.0
added 168 characters in body
Apr 9, 2019 at 10:19 comment added RC0993 completely trackable on its own merit is his personal opinion. Is there any particular reason for not having a cameo? It literally showed Superman faceless, why not just get Cavill to potray his own character? I suppose your answer is acceptable as it is directly towards the question. I will wait for sometime before accepting it though.
Apr 9, 2019 at 10:13 history answered Ankit Sharma CC BY-SA 4.0