Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 25, 2019 at 19:03 comment added JonathanReez None of the current projections actually predict the extinction of man-kind through anything other than nuclear warfare. Some regions might become uninhabitable in the future, but even the worst models leave plenty of space for billions of people. As long as China, Russia and the US have enough habitable land, we'll be fine.
Apr 1, 2019 at 16:08 comment added user63699 less polarizing? yes. Plausible? needn't be. Agro disaster doesn't mean you must leave earth. Scientists already are growing lab meat. there'd be some innovation for food too. And dust bowl needn't be everywhere on globe. I'd buy the point from answer that it was idea out of Nolan's intentions. They want to move out of earth not because earth isn't livable rather they wanted to conquer universe
Apr 1, 2019 at 15:59 comment added user25738 All those other things have already spawned countless disaster movies. An agricultural disaster without political interventions (or lack thereof) is just as plausible and less polarizing to an audience.
Mar 30, 2019 at 21:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackMovies/status/1112097312388595712
S Mar 30, 2019 at 14:39 history suggested OrangeDog CC BY-SA 4.0
Opposite meaning in title
Mar 30, 2019 at 14:20 review Suggested edits
S Mar 30, 2019 at 14:39
Mar 30, 2019 at 10:18 comment added user63699 Indeed I wanted to add that question in mine as a reference. However, that question seeks in-universe answer and mine out-of-universe
Mar 30, 2019 at 10:16 history edited Napoleon Wilson CC BY-SA 4.0
added 23 characters in body; edited tags
Mar 30, 2019 at 10:13 comment added Napoleon Wilson This is somewhat touched upon a little in the answers to this question.
Mar 30, 2019 at 9:44 history became hot network question
Mar 30, 2019 at 8:07 vote accept CommunityBot
Mar 30, 2019 at 7:57 answer added Anne Daunted GoFundMonica timeline score: 14
Mar 30, 2019 at 7:06 history asked user63699 CC BY-SA 4.0