Skip to main content
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Darth Locke
  • 23.5k
  • 5
  • 71
  • 127

Director Alex Garland’s second film, Annihilation—following Ex Machina—was released in North American theaters in February 2018 and it flopped.

In addition, Paramount sold the film’s international rights to Netflix, so the film won’t be available to the public on widescreen outside of the U.S., Canada and China.

I watched the film on Netflix and—while it is still a great experience—could tell the film was obviously made for big screen and the home viewer surely will miss out not watching it in a movie theater. According to a film critic, Devindra Hardawar:

If you're just watching it on a TV or -- movie gods forbid -- on your laptop or tablet, you'll definitely miss out on the film's epic scope and rich sound design. Several sequences seemed purposefully built to be experienced with a crowd on an enormous screen. A scene with a monster prowling through a room, as our intrepid explorers can only sit trembling, praying not to get attacked, had my audience holding their breath. (I could tell from the collective sigh of relief when it was all over.) The film's astounding finale, a dialogue-free visual feast that would be right at home at the Museum of Modern Art, felt almost like a collective religious experience.

Another fan of Garland’s work wrote:

Seeing Annihilation for the first time on the small screen left me with the sense that I'd missed something from the whole experience. It's the first time I've been denied the opportunity to watch an Alex Garland movie in a cinema, which is how I'd experienced all of his work thus far, from 28 Days Later onward.

Why didn't Paramount did not give a chance for an international audiences to watch the film on the big screen?

Director Alex Garland’s second film, Annihilation—following Ex Machina—was released in North American theaters in February 2018 and it flopped.

In addition, Paramount sold the film’s international rights to Netflix, so the film won’t be available to the public on widescreen outside of the U.S., Canada and China.

I watched the film on Netflix and—while it is still a great experience—could tell the film was obviously made for big screen and the home viewer surely will miss out not watching it in a movie theater. According to a film critic, Devindra Hardawar:

If you're just watching it on a TV or -- movie gods forbid -- on your laptop or tablet, you'll definitely miss out on the film's epic scope and rich sound design. Several sequences seemed purposefully built to be experienced with a crowd on an enormous screen. A scene with a monster prowling through a room, as our intrepid explorers can only sit trembling, praying not to get attacked, had my audience holding their breath. (I could tell from the collective sigh of relief when it was all over.) The film's astounding finale, a dialogue-free visual feast that would be right at home at the Museum of Modern Art, felt almost like a collective religious experience.

Another fan of Garland’s work wrote:

Seeing Annihilation for the first time on the small screen left me with the sense that I'd missed something from the whole experience. It's the first time I've been denied the opportunity to watch an Alex Garland movie in a cinema, which is how I'd experienced all of his work thus far, from 28 Days Later onward.

Why Paramount did not give a chance for international audiences to watch the film on the big screen?

Director Alex Garland’s second film, Annihilation—following Ex Machina—was released in North American theaters in February 2018 and it flopped.

In addition, Paramount sold the film’s international rights to Netflix, so the film won’t be available to the public on widescreen outside of the U.S., Canada and China.

I watched the film on Netflix and—while it is still a great experience—could tell the film was obviously made for big screen and the home viewer surely will miss out not watching it in a movie theater. According to a film critic, Devindra Hardawar:

If you're just watching it on a TV or -- movie gods forbid -- on your laptop or tablet, you'll definitely miss out on the film's epic scope and rich sound design. Several sequences seemed purposefully built to be experienced with a crowd on an enormous screen. A scene with a monster prowling through a room, as our intrepid explorers can only sit trembling, praying not to get attacked, had my audience holding their breath. (I could tell from the collective sigh of relief when it was all over.) The film's astounding finale, a dialogue-free visual feast that would be right at home at the Museum of Modern Art, felt almost like a collective religious experience.

Another fan of Garland’s work wrote:

Seeing Annihilation for the first time on the small screen left me with the sense that I'd missed something from the whole experience. It's the first time I've been denied the opportunity to watch an Alex Garland movie in a cinema, which is how I'd experienced all of his work thus far, from 28 Days Later onward.

Why didn't Paramount give a chance for an international audiences to watch the film on the big screen?

Director Alex Garland'sGarland’s second film, Annihilation followingAnnihilation—following Ex Machina was—was released in NorthenNorth American theaters in February 2018 and it flopped.

In addition, Paramount sold the film’s international rights to Netflix, so the film won'twon’t be available to the public on widescreen outside of the U.S., Canada, and China.

I watched the film on Netflix, but while and—while it is still a great experience,experience—could tell the film was obviously made for big screen and the home viewer surely will miss out not watching it in a movie theater. According to a film critic, Devindra Hardawar:

If you're just watching it on a TV or -- movie gods forbid -- on your laptop laptop or tablet, you'll definitely miss out on the film's epic scope and and rich sound design. Several sequences seemed purposefully built to be be experienced with a crowd on an enormous screen. A scene with a monster monster prowling through a room, as our intrepid explorers can only sit sit trembling, praying not to get attacked, had my audience holding their their breath. (I could tell from the collective sigh of relief when it was was all over.) The film's astounding finale, a dialogue-free visual feast feast that would be right at home at the Museum of Modern Art, felt almost almost like a collective religious experience.

anotherAnother fan of Garland'sGarland’s work wrote:

Seeing Annihilation for the first time on the small screen left me with with the sense that I'd missed something from the whole experience. It's It's the first time I've been denied the opportunity to watch an Alex Garland Garland movie in a cinema, which is how I'd experienced all of his work work thus far, from 28 Days Later onward.

Why Paramount did not give a chance for international audiences to watch the international publicfilm on the big screen?

Director Alex Garland's second film, Annihilation following Ex Machina was released in Northen American theaters in February 2018 and it flopped.

In addition, Paramount sold the film’s international rights to Netflix, so the film won't be available to the public on widescreen outside of the U.S., Canada, and China.

I watched the film on Netflix, but while it is still a great experience, the film was obviously made for big screen and the home viewer surely will miss out not watching it in a movie theater. According to a film critic, Devindra Hardawar:

If you're just watching it on a TV or -- movie gods forbid -- on your laptop or tablet, you'll definitely miss out on the film's epic scope and rich sound design. Several sequences seemed purposefully built to be experienced with a crowd on an enormous screen. A scene with a monster prowling through a room, as our intrepid explorers can only sit trembling, praying not to get attacked, had my audience holding their breath. (I could tell from the collective sigh of relief when it was all over.) The film's astounding finale, a dialogue-free visual feast that would be right at home at the Museum of Modern Art, felt almost like a collective religious experience.

another fan of Garland's work wrote:

Seeing Annihilation for the first time on the small screen left me with the sense that I'd missed something from the whole experience. It's the first time I've been denied the opportunity to watch an Alex Garland movie in a cinema, which is how I'd experienced all of his work thus far, from 28 Days Later onward.

Why Paramount did not give a chance to the international public?

Director Alex Garland’s second film, Annihilation—following Ex Machina—was released in North American theaters in February 2018 and it flopped.

In addition, Paramount sold the film’s international rights to Netflix, so the film won’t be available to the public on widescreen outside of the U.S., Canada and China.

I watched the film on Netflix and—while it is still a great experience—could tell the film was obviously made for big screen and the home viewer surely will miss out not watching it in a movie theater. According to a film critic, Devindra Hardawar:

If you're just watching it on a TV or -- movie gods forbid -- on your laptop or tablet, you'll definitely miss out on the film's epic scope and rich sound design. Several sequences seemed purposefully built to be experienced with a crowd on an enormous screen. A scene with a monster prowling through a room, as our intrepid explorers can only sit trembling, praying not to get attacked, had my audience holding their breath. (I could tell from the collective sigh of relief when it was all over.) The film's astounding finale, a dialogue-free visual feast that would be right at home at the Museum of Modern Art, felt almost like a collective religious experience.

Another fan of Garland’s work wrote:

Seeing Annihilation for the first time on the small screen left me with the sense that I'd missed something from the whole experience. It's the first time I've been denied the opportunity to watch an Alex Garland movie in a cinema, which is how I'd experienced all of his work thus far, from 28 Days Later onward.

Why Paramount did not give a chance for international audiences to watch the film on the big screen?

Tweeted twitter.com/StackMovies/status/977645935042924545
deleted 63 characters in body
Source Link
user38017
user38017

Director Alex Garland's second film, Annihilation following Ex Machina was released in Northen American theaters in February 2018 and it flopped.

In addition, Paramount sold the film’s international rights to Netflix, so the film won't be available to the public on widescreen outside of the U.S., Canada, and China.

I watched the film on Netflix, but while it is still a great experience, the film was obviously made for big screen and the home viewer surely will miss out not watching it in a movie theater. According to a film critic, Devindra Hardawar:

If you're just watching it on a TV or -- movie gods forbid -- on your laptop or tablet, you'll definitely miss out on the film's epic scope and rich sound design. Several sequences seemed purposefully built to be experienced with a crowd on an enormous screen. A scene with a monster prowling through a room, as our intrepid explorers can only sit trembling, praying not to get attacked, had my audience holding their breath. (I could tell from the collective sigh of relief when it was all over.) The film's astounding finale, a dialogue-free visual feast that would be right at home at the Museum of Modern Art, felt almost like a collective religious experience.

another fan of Garland's work wrote:

Seeing Annihilation for the first time on the small screen left me with the sense that I'd missed something from the whole experience. It's the first time I've been denied the opportunity to watch an Alex Garland movie in a cinema, which is how I'd experienced all of his work thus far, from 28 Days Later onward.

Why Paramount did not give a chance to the international public and based its decision solely on the North American Box Office?

Director Alex Garland's second film, Annihilation following Ex Machina was released in Northen American theaters in February 2018 and it flopped.

In addition, Paramount sold the film’s international rights to Netflix, so the film won't be available to the public on widescreen outside of the U.S., Canada, and China.

I watched the film on Netflix, but while it is still a great experience, the film was obviously made for big screen and the home viewer surely will miss out not watching it in a movie theater. According to a film critic, Devindra Hardawar:

If you're just watching it on a TV or -- movie gods forbid -- on your laptop or tablet, you'll definitely miss out on the film's epic scope and rich sound design. Several sequences seemed purposefully built to be experienced with a crowd on an enormous screen. A scene with a monster prowling through a room, as our intrepid explorers can only sit trembling, praying not to get attacked, had my audience holding their breath. (I could tell from the collective sigh of relief when it was all over.) The film's astounding finale, a dialogue-free visual feast that would be right at home at the Museum of Modern Art, felt almost like a collective religious experience.

another fan of Garland's work wrote:

Seeing Annihilation for the first time on the small screen left me with the sense that I'd missed something from the whole experience. It's the first time I've been denied the opportunity to watch an Alex Garland movie in a cinema, which is how I'd experienced all of his work thus far, from 28 Days Later onward.

Why Paramount did not give a chance to the international public and based its decision solely on the North American Box Office?

Director Alex Garland's second film, Annihilation following Ex Machina was released in Northen American theaters in February 2018 and it flopped.

In addition, Paramount sold the film’s international rights to Netflix, so the film won't be available to the public on widescreen outside of the U.S., Canada, and China.

I watched the film on Netflix, but while it is still a great experience, the film was obviously made for big screen and the home viewer surely will miss out not watching it in a movie theater. According to a film critic, Devindra Hardawar:

If you're just watching it on a TV or -- movie gods forbid -- on your laptop or tablet, you'll definitely miss out on the film's epic scope and rich sound design. Several sequences seemed purposefully built to be experienced with a crowd on an enormous screen. A scene with a monster prowling through a room, as our intrepid explorers can only sit trembling, praying not to get attacked, had my audience holding their breath. (I could tell from the collective sigh of relief when it was all over.) The film's astounding finale, a dialogue-free visual feast that would be right at home at the Museum of Modern Art, felt almost like a collective religious experience.

another fan of Garland's work wrote:

Seeing Annihilation for the first time on the small screen left me with the sense that I'd missed something from the whole experience. It's the first time I've been denied the opportunity to watch an Alex Garland movie in a cinema, which is how I'd experienced all of his work thus far, from 28 Days Later onward.

Why Paramount did not give a chance to the international public?

deleted 10 characters in body
Source Link
user38017
user38017
Loading
Source Link
user38017
user38017
Loading