Skip to main content
formatting, possible problem with answer, minor edits.
Source Link
Max Burns
  • 1.7k
  • 13
  • 19

The way I understood the scene, Luna was able to see the wrackspurts around him. I see it being similar to how flies might be circling an invisible trash can. Luna's beliefs in such things may be considered insane by most of the wizarding community, but I guess that's just how they decided to do the scene. Therefore, I would go withsay it's a plot inconsistency/hole.

In response to those who feel that Dumbledore's ability to immobilize Harry at the end of book 6 is evidence that the cloak does not ward against spells or magical abilities, we must remember that this is Dumbledore we're talking about. Dumbledore is considered the most powerful wizard in living memory, possibly of all time.

In book 2, it's hinted that he was able to see through Harry's invisibility cloak in the scene with Hagrid being arrested and Dumbledore being removed from the school.
In book 7, it's stated that invisibility cloaks are not infallible, that the charm or effect wears off over time. Dumbledore rejects the belief that the hallows were created by 'death' instead believing they were just created by 3 very powerful wizards.

  • In book 2, it's hinted that he was able to see through Harry's invisibility cloak in the scene with Hagrid being arrested and Dumbledore being removed from the school.
  • In book 7, it's stated that invisibility cloaks are not infallible, that the charm or effect wears off over time. Dumbledore rejects the belief that the hallows were created by 'death' instead believing they were just created by 3 very powerful wizards.

If that is the case, then it can simply be explained by Dumbledore's petrification spell being strong enough to pierce any protections that the invisibility cloak might have.

However, in book 7 it's also shown that Harry's invisibility cloak was resistant to spells. The Thief's Downfall:

  • The Thief's Downfall, supposed to remove any magical effects, did not affect the cloak when they broke into Gringott's.
  • When Harry, Ron, and Hermione apparate into Hogsmeade, a Death Eater hears the noise and attempts to summon the cloak off of them, which has no effect, not even a minimal one.

Then again, supposed to remove any magical effectsIn the beginning of book 6, did not affectit's shown that Draco Malfoy used Petrificus Totalus on Harry while he is invisible due to the invisibility cloak when they broke into Gringott's. When Harry, Ron,on the train ride to Hogwarts. While Malfoy's abilities are noted to have increased significantly between books 5 and Hermione apparate into Hogsmeade6, a Death Eater hearsit is all but guaranteed that he was still nowhere near Dumbledore's capabilities. With the noise and attempts to summonevents in book 7 displaying the resistance properties of the invisibility cloak offmore prominently than any of themthe previous books, which hasI think this is just a plot hole, this time by J K Rowling. As above, a death eater's spell had no effect on the cloak and the Thief's Downfall securing Gringott's from magical intrusion is likely to be a far more powerful effect than Malfoy's Petrificus Totalus.

The way I understood the scene, Luna was able to see the wrackspurts around him. I see it being similar to how flies might be circling an invisible trash can. Luna's beliefs in such things may be considered insane by most of the wizarding community, but I guess that's just how they decided to do the scene. Therefore, I would go with plot inconsistency.

In response to those who feel that Dumbledore's ability to immobilize Harry at the end of book 6 is evidence that the cloak does not ward against spells or magical abilities, we must remember that this is Dumbledore we're talking about. Dumbledore is considered the most powerful wizard in living memory, possibly of all time.

In book 2, it's hinted that he was able to see through Harry's invisibility cloak in the scene with Hagrid being arrested and Dumbledore being removed from the school.
In book 7, it's stated that invisibility cloaks are not infallible, that the charm or effect wears off over time. Dumbledore rejects the belief that the hallows were created by 'death' instead believing they were just created by 3 very powerful wizards.

If that is the case, then it can simply be explained by Dumbledore's petrification spell being strong enough to pierce any protections that the invisibility cloak might have.

However, in book 7 it's also shown that Harry's invisibility cloak was resistant to spells. The Thief's Downfall, supposed to remove any magical effects, did not affect the cloak when they broke into Gringott's. When Harry, Ron, and Hermione apparate into Hogsmeade, a Death Eater hears the noise and attempts to summon the cloak off of them, which has no effect.

The way I understood the scene, Luna was able to see the wrackspurts around him. I see it being similar to how flies might be circling an invisible trash can. Luna's beliefs in such things may be considered insane by most of the wizarding community, but I guess that's just how they decided to do the scene. Therefore, I would say it's a plot inconsistency/hole.

In response to those who feel that Dumbledore's ability to immobilize Harry at the end of book 6 is evidence that the cloak does not ward against spells or magical abilities, we must remember that this is Dumbledore we're talking about. Dumbledore is considered the most powerful wizard in living memory, possibly of all time.

  • In book 2, it's hinted that he was able to see through Harry's invisibility cloak in the scene with Hagrid being arrested and Dumbledore being removed from the school.
  • In book 7, it's stated that invisibility cloaks are not infallible, that the charm or effect wears off over time. Dumbledore rejects the belief that the hallows were created by 'death' instead believing they were just created by 3 very powerful wizards.

If that is the case, then it can simply be explained by Dumbledore's petrification spell being strong enough to pierce any protections that the invisibility cloak might have.

However, in book 7 it's also shown that Harry's invisibility cloak was resistant to spells:

  • The Thief's Downfall, supposed to remove any magical effects, did not affect the cloak when they broke into Gringott's.
  • When Harry, Ron, and Hermione apparate into Hogsmeade, a Death Eater hears the noise and attempts to summon the cloak off of them, which has no effect, not even a minimal one.

Then again, In the beginning of book 6, it's shown that Draco Malfoy used Petrificus Totalus on Harry while he is invisible due to the invisibility cloak, on the train ride to Hogwarts. While Malfoy's abilities are noted to have increased significantly between books 5 and 6, it is all but guaranteed that he was still nowhere near Dumbledore's capabilities. With the events in book 7 displaying the resistance properties of the invisibility cloak more prominently than any of the previous books, I think this is just a plot hole, this time by J K Rowling. As above, a death eater's spell had no effect on the cloak and the Thief's Downfall securing Gringott's from magical intrusion is likely to be a far more powerful effect than Malfoy's Petrificus Totalus.

Source Link
Max Burns
  • 1.7k
  • 13
  • 19

The way I understood the scene, Luna was able to see the wrackspurts around him. I see it being similar to how flies might be circling an invisible trash can. Luna's beliefs in such things may be considered insane by most of the wizarding community, but I guess that's just how they decided to do the scene. Therefore, I would go with plot inconsistency.

In response to those who feel that Dumbledore's ability to immobilize Harry at the end of book 6 is evidence that the cloak does not ward against spells or magical abilities, we must remember that this is Dumbledore we're talking about. Dumbledore is considered the most powerful wizard in living memory, possibly of all time.

In book 2, it's hinted that he was able to see through Harry's invisibility cloak in the scene with Hagrid being arrested and Dumbledore being removed from the school.
In book 7, it's stated that invisibility cloaks are not infallible, that the charm or effect wears off over time. Dumbledore rejects the belief that the hallows were created by 'death' instead believing they were just created by 3 very powerful wizards.

If that is the case, then it can simply be explained by Dumbledore's petrification spell being strong enough to pierce any protections that the invisibility cloak might have.

However, in book 7 it's also shown that Harry's invisibility cloak was resistant to spells. The Thief's Downfall, supposed to remove any magical effects, did not affect the cloak when they broke into Gringott's. When Harry, Ron, and Hermione apparate into Hogsmeade, a Death Eater hears the noise and attempts to summon the cloak off of them, which has no effect.