Timeline for Why are Frozen's Elsa and Anna excluded from the Disney Princesses franchise?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2019 at 20:50 | comment | added | MissouriSpartan | To quote from RBTI: They're "from the other studio"............. :) | |
| Mar 29, 2018 at 14:01 | vote | accept | Ankit Sharma♦ | ||
| Dec 28, 2017 at 3:59 | comment | added | Kyle Strand | @Segfault If indeed the primary or only marketable aspect of the characters is the relationship between them (as is probably the case for, say, Timon and Pumba), then sure, the marketing machine will probably recognize that. But I'm not sure that's true in this case. | |
| Dec 27, 2017 at 20:08 | comment | added | Segfault | The things to be marketed are in fact characters of a story. The story of the characters will affect the marketing because it is the story that creates the demand in the marketplace. This is not to explicitly support the comment, necessarily, but you shouldn't dismiss it like that. | |
| Dec 27, 2017 at 19:03 | comment | added | Kyle Strand | @brichins You do realize that you're responding to a claim about a "marketing machine" with a point about "stories and characters", right? | |
| Dec 26, 2017 at 22:56 | comment | added | brichins | Can't imagine they'd get moved separately - their stories and characters are far too closely tied. | |
| Dec 26, 2017 at 20:57 | history | answered | T.J.L. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |