Timeline for Is 70mm really necessary? Wouldn't it work with 35mm too?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2017 at 11:09 | comment | added | TondaCZE | For some reason, I can't add another answer here, so I'm adding it as a comment. I'm un-accepting the answer, because I just learn something I had no idea about and it seems neither you. Dunkirk has actually been shot in analog and then is again projected in analog in IMAX. That's obviously huge difference and my original question doesn't even make sense. | |
| Aug 8, 2017 at 22:45 | vote | accept | TondaCZE | ||
| Aug 24, 2017 at 11:06 | |||||
| Aug 7, 2017 at 11:32 | comment | added | TondaCZE | Thanks for answer, I may accept it later if no other shows up. You basically supported my expectations. Probably what makes the biggest difference in perceiving the movie as "better" is the size of the screen, also the fact that it's curved. So big that when you are watching something on the right, you actually have to move your head to see things on the left. One additional question, are there movies which were screened in IMAX but shot on 35mm? Preferably not even using the whole sensor to keep the full IMAX ratio. Would love to see some to see the difference. | |
| Aug 7, 2017 at 3:20 | history | answered | user1118321 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |