Timeline for Which is technically visually of higher quality - 70mm without IMAX or IMAX without 70mm?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2018 at 21:36 | answer | added | theMayer | timeline score: -1 | |
| Oct 5, 2017 at 23:44 | vote | accept | Keshav Srinivasan | ||
| Aug 3, 2017 at 22:37 | answer | added | dvaeg | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 3, 2017 at 22:03 | history | reopened |
Keshav Srinivasan Catija A J♦ Napoleon Wilson |
||
| Aug 3, 2017 at 22:03 | history | edited | Napoleon Wilson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 238 characters in body
|
| Aug 3, 2017 at 6:07 | history | edited | Keshav Srinivasan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 238 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2017 at 19:23 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Aug 3, 2017 at 12:13 | |||||
| Aug 2, 2017 at 19:18 | comment | added | BCdotWEB | slashfilm.com/dunkirk-70mm-locations | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 18:56 | history | closed |
Chanandler Bong Steve-O Paulie_D mattiav27 Gustavo Gabriel |
Opinion-based | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 18:17 | comment | added | Catija | Related: movies.stackexchange.com/questions/36233/… movies.stackexchange.com/questions/73151/… | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 18:14 | history | edited | Catija | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:58 | comment | added | Ghoti and Chips | I feel like if everyone went out of their way to choose the "regular" option and avoid the newer, better technology, movies would still be in black and white without dialogue audio. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:54 | history | edited | Keshav Srinivasan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 151 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:51 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 2, 2017 at 18:56 | |||||
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:49 | comment | added | Steve-O | In that case, perhaps you should rephrase the question to emphasize that you're looking for an objective analysis of the technical specifications of each format. Asking which one is "better" invites speculation and personal opinion. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:47 | comment | added | Keshav Srinivasan | @Steve-O I'm not really interested in what's "worth the money" or not, or what causes headaches, I'm just interested in what's a superior format. If you had unlimited money and immunity from headaches, which would be the better format to see a movie in? | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:45 | comment | added | Steve-O | Seems opinion-based to me. For example, I always choose the "regular" option - to the point of not going to see movies that aren't available as such. I consider the IMAX stuff gimmicky and doesn't add that much to the experience to be worth it. Also, 3D gives me a headache, every time. So, I would challenge the idea that a regular screening is "obviously" inferior. | |
| Aug 2, 2017 at 17:33 | history | asked | Keshav Srinivasan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |