Timeline for Why are there so few movies about the Vietnam war itself?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2020 at 15:16 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 7, 2017 at 7:07 | comment | added | Ankit Sharma♦ | Congratulations, for the Rewards for the best answer of 2nd quarter of 2017 | |
| Aug 7, 2017 at 7:06 | history | bounty ended | Ankit Sharma♦ | ||
| Apr 18, 2017 at 17:21 | history | edited | Thunderforge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Apr 17, 2017 at 12:37 | comment | added | steelersquirrel | Yes.. Michael Paris is a well respected historian and specializes in war and popular culture. Pretty much anything that Mr. Paris publishes about war should be considered authoritative. | |
| Apr 17, 2017 at 3:53 | history | edited | Thunderforge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 87 characters in body
|
| Apr 17, 2017 at 3:51 | comment | added | Thunderforge | @cde I consider this individual to be an expert in the field, given that he is published in several peer-reviewed journals. While History Today is not peer-reviewed, I believe that it has a high standard of quality for any articles in publishes. | |
| Apr 17, 2017 at 3:34 | history | edited | Thunderforge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Apr 17, 2017 at 3:31 | comment | added | cde | What makes this single "scholar" significant enough to not be "primarily opinion based"? What makes this single "source" "authoritative"? | |
| Apr 17, 2017 at 3:26 | history | answered | Thunderforge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |