Timeline for How did Voldemort know he could access Harry's mind but not realise this was because part of his soul was latched onto him?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMovies/status/852627518771351552 | ||
| Apr 12, 2017 at 19:06 | answer | added | John | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 12:31 | comment | added | BCdotWEB | Same question on S&F SE by the same user: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/157037/… | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 10:52 | comment | added | JMac | @SS. "the definition will be that a receptacle is prepared by Dark Magic to become the receptacle of a fragmented piece of soul, and that that piece of soul was deliberately detached from the master soul to act as a future safeguard, or anchor, to life, and a safeguard against death." This was accidental, and therefore not a Horcrux, even if it performed the same actions. | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 10:49 | comment | added | Nog Shine | @JMac Yeah. I did. But that is not easy to digest. Voldemort didn't cast the horcrux spell in case of harry. It was accidental. I know that. But a part of Voldemort's soul lived in Harry . Isn't it? | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 10:46 | comment | added | JMac | @SS. Did you even read the link? JKR herself said that a Horcrux is deliberate, and that what happened with Harry wasn't technically a Horcrux because of the accidental nature. | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 10:42 | comment | added | Nog Shine | Harry not a horcrux? That would make whole Harry potter series no sense. He was not intentionally horcrux. But he is a Horcrux. | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 9:37 | comment | added | user82081 | Apologies, but I had to edit it because Harry is not a Horcrux. See here - scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/11530/… | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 9:17 | history | edited | Napoleon Wilson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 9:12 | answer | added | Panther | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 9:09 | comment | added | Nog Shine | First version was good. Why did you edit the title? Keep the title simple. | |
| Apr 12, 2017 at 9:05 | history | edited | user82081 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited the question
|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 8:59 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 12, 2017 at 9:08 | |||||
| Apr 12, 2017 at 8:58 | history | asked | user82081 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |