Timeline for Why is there a disclaimer about not accepting money from tobacco companies at the end of movies?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 17, 2020 at 20:36 | comment | added | CGCampbell | IIRC, when Dr Stone is talking on the radio with Aningaaq, we hear him light a cigarette. | |
Jan 19, 2017 at 21:08 | comment | added | PStag | To me it seems like either tradition or an inside joke of some kind. I'm not a lawyer but I am quite sure those statements don't change anything. | |
Jan 19, 2017 at 18:37 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | @PavelJanicek <shrug> Not to me. Both seem like utterly irrelevant fine print to me (in the general case), which would point at a similar or related underlying reason, whatever it is. Just pointing out that this cigarette advertising disclaimer is hardly the only disclaimer you may see at the end of a film which has little to no ostensible relevance to the film it proceeds. | |
Jan 19, 2017 at 18:31 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | @Thunderforge: It's more about ensuring that nobody can get away with absurdly claiming that they did just that, in court. | |
Jan 19, 2017 at 18:14 | comment | added | Pavel Janicek | @HopelessN00b that was kinda "self-explanatory" to me. But disclaimer about tobacco products at the end of movie where I do not even remember someone was smoking was quite surprising to me | |
Jan 19, 2017 at 17:26 | comment | added | HopelessN00b | Why do a lot of movies movies have a "No Animals Were Harmed..." disclaimer? | |
Jan 19, 2017 at 7:50 | vote | accept | Pavel Janicek | ||
Jan 18, 2017 at 18:30 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMovies/status/821786872255021065 | ||
Jan 18, 2017 at 16:12 | comment | added | Thunderforge | These sorts of disclaimers aren't limited to tobacco. The credits for Doctor Strange end with a disclaimer saying that texting and driving is dangerous and potentially fatal. I figured that would be obvious enough from what happened to him in the film, but maybe they wanted to make sure nobody thought you would get superpowers if you got in a car accident due to this? | |
Jan 18, 2017 at 12:52 | comment | added | user37459 | Have you seen The Insider? | |
Jan 18, 2017 at 9:33 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected spelling and grammar
|
Jan 18, 2017 at 9:30 | answer | added | John | timeline score: 65 | |
Jan 18, 2017 at 8:51 | history | edited | Ankit Sharma♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Jan 18, 2017 at 8:30 | history | edited | Panther |
Not related to ending of movie
|
|
Jan 18, 2017 at 8:30 | answer | added | jimsug | timeline score: 10 | |
Jan 18, 2017 at 8:17 | history | asked | Pavel Janicek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |