Skip to main content
Rollback to Revision 3
Source Link
Napoleon Wilson
  • 59.3k
  • 65
  • 346
  • 674

In addition to Ankit Sharma's answer, I think there's a second meaning. During the movie, the short-sighted woman (Rachel Weisz)

loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.)

loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.) It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to

blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them.

blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them. I think the poster represents that fairly well.

In addition to Ankit Sharma's answer, I think there's a second meaning. During the movie, the short-sighted woman (Rachel Weisz)

loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.)

It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to

blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them.

I think the poster represents that fairly well.

In addition to Ankit Sharma's answer, I think there's a second meaning. During the movie, the short-sighted woman (Rachel Weisz) loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.) It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them. I think the poster represents that fairly well.

Added spoiler text
Source Link
user1118321
  • 5.3k
  • 23
  • 39

In addition to Ankit Sharma's answer, I think there's a second meaning. During the movie, the short-sighted woman (Rachel Weisz) loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.)

loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.)

It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them.

blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them.

I think the poster represents that fairly well.

In addition to Ankit Sharma's answer, I think there's a second meaning. During the movie, the short-sighted woman (Rachel Weisz) loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.) It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them. I think the poster represents that fairly well.

In addition to Ankit Sharma's answer, I think there's a second meaning. During the movie, the short-sighted woman (Rachel Weisz)

loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.)

It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to

blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them.

I think the poster represents that fairly well.

Rollback to Revision 1
Source Link
Napoleon Wilson
  • 59.3k
  • 65
  • 346
  • 674

In addition to Ankit Sharma's answer, I think there's a second meaning.

  During the movie, the short-sighted woman (SpolierRachel Weisz) loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.) It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them. I think the poster represents that fairly well.

During the movie, the short-sighted woman (Rachel Weisz) loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.) It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them. I think the poster represents that fairly well.

In addition to Ankit Sharma's answer, I think there's a second meaning.

 (Spolier)

During the movie, the short-sighted woman (Rachel Weisz) loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.) It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them. I think the poster represents that fairly well.

In addition to Ankit Sharma's answer, I think there's a second meaning. During the movie, the short-sighted woman (Rachel Weisz) loses her sight. She's no longer able to see the person she loves. (And she loses it because she loves him.) It's implied at the end of the movie that David (Collin Ferrel) is going to blind himself, leaving him also unable to see his lover. Once they're blind, they will only be able to feel their lovers embrace, but not actually see them. I think the poster represents that fairly well.

Source Link
user1118321
  • 5.3k
  • 23
  • 39
Loading