Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 8, 2020 at 13:44 comment added webworm I have to respectfully disagree. It was entirely personal. Fredo was no threat to Mike. He was weak and timid fool and content to live out his pathetic life living on the family's Nevada compound. It was Fredo's betrayal of Mike and the family. Above all else, Mike valued loyalty. He never forgave Fredo for conspiring with Roth and attempting to have Mike killed. Notice how he waited until their mother was dead before killing Fredo. As soon as she was gone he had Fredo killed. It was a decision that would haunt him the rest of his life (see Godfather III).
Nov 9, 2016 at 15:26 vote accept Erba Aitbayev
Nov 8, 2016 at 18:23 history edited akr CC BY-SA 3.0
Acknowledged comments.
Nov 8, 2016 at 15:59 comment added PoloHoleSet Was going to say, should be edited to state that he admitted betraying Sonny. It's still business, but the business there is that any attempt on a member of the family will mean death to all involved, in which case Fredo and Carlo do fit in the same category. Probably not a bad general rule to have everyone out there know about if killing people is a regular part of the business transactions.
Nov 8, 2016 at 11:06 comment added aaa +1 for the first part but I do not agree with the second part. Carlo used to abuse his sister and was in the conspiracy to kill Sonny. So there are three main differences here: 1) Carlo was no blood related 2) His action got his brother killed 3) He used to beat Michael's sister
Nov 7, 2016 at 23:23 history edited akr CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 45 characters in body
Nov 7, 2016 at 21:38 review First posts
Nov 7, 2016 at 21:45
Nov 7, 2016 at 21:34 history answered akr CC BY-SA 3.0