Timeline for To what extent are child actors exposed to the violent aspects of the movie they perform in?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2019 at 1:17 | history | edited | Laurel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
HTTPS switch
|
| Sep 16, 2017 at 16:25 | comment | added | Darrel Hoffman | @Flater - Maybe in Belgium that's okay. I'm certain there'd be pitchfork and torch wielding mobs if that happened in the US. We tend to be a little uptight about that sort of thing. | |
| Sep 8, 2017 at 11:12 | comment | added | Flater | @DarrelHoffman: Nope, it's still acceptable (this is an ad, not a movie, but it proves the point regardless). You can see that the people in the ad are surprised by the filthy lyrics, but the existence and broadcast of the ad proves that it's still acceptable to do so. Coincidentally, this is a Belgian ad, which is the country OP seems to hail from (as do I). | |
| Sep 8, 2017 at 2:37 | answer | added | natural | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 20, 2017 at 2:13 | comment | added | natural | This is such a good question, it practically dwarfs anyo of mine personally. | |
| Mar 8, 2016 at 19:03 | comment | added | John Sensebe | @cde, no need for digital children as the other methods you outlined would suffice in most cases and be a lot less expensive. The only cases where you might need digital children is if the action were exceedingly dangerous, i.e. monster throws baby through window, or not possible with a real child, i.e. monster bites child's head off and savors its sweet, sweet baby brains. | |
| Mar 2, 2016 at 15:19 | comment | added | Michael Borgwardt | @DarrelHoffman Still wouldn't be a big problem in Europe. | |
| Mar 2, 2016 at 14:22 | comment | added | Darrel Hoffman | @user3528: I'm thinking about the scene from Monty Python and the Meaning of Life, where a children's choir is involved in the song "Every Sperm is Sacred". I feel like they couldn't get away with that a anymore in modern cinema... | |
| Nov 30, 2015 at 16:49 | history | edited | Napoleon Wilson |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 10:16 | comment | added | cde | Considering modern day digital movie techniques, monsters and people can be completely digital, so the child is playing against a green screen morph suit and tracking points, or simply film alternative takes, one with the child and no monster, the other without the child and the monster and merge them in. Or better, digital children, 100% digital, except for maybe a voice actor. In a couple of years, a big budget movie would have no excuse in requiring a child to act out scary things. | |
| Jun 12, 2015 at 20:15 | answer | added | user9668 | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jan 17, 2015 at 0:37 | comment | added | Relaxed | @tubedogg In the US maybe but not in Europe (and in particular in Belgium, where the OP apparently lives). | |
| Dec 30, 2014 at 6:53 | comment | added | tubedogg | Ratings, while implemented in an attempt to prevent actual government regulation of the television and movie industries, have no basis or enforcement in actual law and are followed by their respective industries on a voluntary basis. | |
| Jul 28, 2013 at 9:25 | history | protected | Mistu4u | ||
| Jul 6, 2013 at 2:07 | answer | added | Geoffrey Booth | timeline score: 43 | |
| Dec 23, 2011 at 11:02 | vote | accept | Laurent Pireyn | ||
| S Dec 22, 2011 at 2:42 | history | suggested | hairboat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
"actors" is just simpler imho
|
| Dec 21, 2011 at 20:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 22, 2011 at 2:42 | |||||
| Dec 21, 2011 at 14:40 | answer | added | Nobby | timeline score: 158 | |
| Dec 21, 2011 at 0:58 | answer | added | Mark Mayo | timeline score: 123 | |
| Dec 21, 2011 at 0:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMovies/status/149278473607843840 | ||
| Dec 20, 2011 at 20:31 | answer | added | 5StringRyan | timeline score: 70 | |
| Dec 20, 2011 at 14:43 | answer | added | Tablemaker | timeline score: 18 | |
| Dec 20, 2011 at 13:50 | history | asked | Laurent Pireyn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |